Comments on: Report: No spying in Pa. school laptops case http://www.eschoolnews.com/2010/05/05/report-no-spying-in-pa-school-laptops-case/ Just another eSchool Media site Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:37:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: mccright http://www.eschoolnews.com/2010/05/05/report-no-spying-in-pa-school-laptops-case/comment-page-1/#comment-841 mccright Wed, 05 May 2010 17:05:18 +0000 http://www.eschoolnews.com/?p=36678#comment-841 The key qualifying clause: according to attorneys HIRED by the district. For another commentary on this story, click on http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/5/3/863299/-%5BUpdate-x3%5D-WebCamGate-Report-Released.-Conclusion-Theyre-screwed. This story has legs and school boards around the country will be asked the same questions: Does our school district have the same capabilities? Who authorizes its use? Where are the images stored? Who has access to the images? and on and on . . . Lower Merton School District's response has been a lesson on what not to do. The key qualifying clause: according to attorneys HIRED by the district. For another commentary on this story, click on http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/5/3/863299/-%5BUpdate-x3%5D-WebCamGate-Report-Released.-Conclusion-Theyre-screwed. This story has legs and school boards around the country will be asked the same questions: Does our school district have the same capabilities? Who authorizes its use? Where are the images stored? Who has access to the images? and on and on . . .

Lower Merton School District’s response has been a lesson on what not to do.

]]> By: mccright http://www.eschoolnews.com/2010/05/05/report-no-spying-in-pa-school-laptops-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2608 mccright Wed, 05 May 2010 17:05:18 +0000 http://www.eschoolnews.com/?p=36678#comment-2608 The key qualifying clause: according to attorneys HIRED by the district. For another commentary on this story, click on http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/5/3/863299/-%5BUpdate-x3%5D-WebCamGate-Report-Released.-Conclusion-Theyre-screwed. This story has legs and school boards around the country will be asked the same questions: Does our school district have the same capabilities? Who authorizes its use? Where are the images stored? Who has access to the images? and on and on . . . Lower Merton School District's response has been a lesson on what not to do. The key qualifying clause: according to attorneys HIRED by the district. For another commentary on this story, click on http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/5/3/863299/-%5BUpdate-x3%5D-WebCamGate-Report-Released.-Conclusion-Theyre-screwed. This story has legs and school boards around the country will be asked the same questions: Does our school district have the same capabilities? Who authorizes its use? Where are the images stored? Who has access to the images? and on and on . . .

Lower Merton School District’s response has been a lesson on what not to do.

]]> By: kevinlongo http://www.eschoolnews.com/2010/05/05/report-no-spying-in-pa-school-laptops-case/comment-page-1/#comment-840 kevinlongo Wed, 05 May 2010 16:42:56 +0000 http://www.eschoolnews.com/?p=36678#comment-840 The school department attorney's report no wrongdoing on the part of their client. What a surprise! Either the IT department was spying or they're inept. You make the decision but one thing is certain, they should be terminated. The school department attorney’s report no wrongdoing on the part of their client. What a surprise! Either the IT department was spying or they’re inept. You make the decision but one thing is certain, they should be terminated.

]]> By: kevinlongo http://www.eschoolnews.com/2010/05/05/report-no-spying-in-pa-school-laptops-case/comment-page-1/#comment-2607 kevinlongo Wed, 05 May 2010 16:42:56 +0000 http://www.eschoolnews.com/?p=36678#comment-2607 The school department attorney's report no wrongdoing on the part of their client. What a surprise! Either the IT department was spying or they're inept. You make the decision but one thing is certain, they should be terminated. The school department attorney’s report no wrongdoing on the part of their client. What a surprise! Either the IT department was spying or they’re inept. You make the decision but one thing is certain, they should be terminated.

]]>