How corporations can really support U.S. public education
As school programs suffer from scarce funding, many corporations are doing just fine

"I have a bold suggestion of my own for how businesses can help improve education," writes Editor Dennis Pierce: "Pay their fair share of taxes."
(Editor’s note: In honor of National Tax Day, we’re rerunning an article that originally appeared last May 31 under the headline “Editorial: God bless taxes.”)
Default Lines column, June 2011 edition of eSchool News—The Institute for a Competitive Workforce, an affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, has issued a new report calling for urgent action to improve U.S. math and science instruction.
Called “The Case for Being Bold: A New Agenda for Business in Improving STEM Education,” the report makes a series of common-sense recommendations that reformers have heard before: rethink teacher hiring and training practices, redesign schools for the 21st century, use technology to personalize instruction, create opportunities for local professionals to help teach students part time … and so on.
Those are laudable goals. But I have a bold suggestion of my own for how businesses can help improve education: Pay their fair share of taxes.
In lobbying for tax reform, the Chamber of Commerce and other members of the business community have long argued that the corporate tax rate in America is the highest in the world. Although that’s true of the top statutory rate, which is 35 percent, very few large corporations pay that much—and many pay far less.
A report issued in February 2011 from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities shows that the average corporate tax rate—that is, the share of profits that U.S. companies actually pay in taxes—is about 13 percent. What’s more, “when measured as a share of the economy, U.S. corporate tax receipts are actually low compared to other developed countries,” the report said.
General Electric made headlines earlier this year when it was revealed the company earned $14.2 billion in profits in 2010 but didn’t pay a dime in U.S. taxes, thanks to crafty accounting practices that took advantage of existing—and perfectly legal—tax loopholes.
But GE is far from alone. As the tax filing deadline for 2011 approached, independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont published a list of 10 hugely profitable corporations that have managed to avoid paying U.S. taxes. ExxonMobil topped the list, having made $19 billion in profits in 2009. ExxonMobil not only paid no federal income tax that year; it actually got a $156 million tax rebate from Uncle Sam, according to SEC filings.
These figures should prompt outrage at a time when state legislatures are taking away the right of educators to collectively bargain and other benefits, and when governments and local school systems are slashing educational programs—in the name of balancing budgets.
2 Responses to How corporations can really support U.S. public education
You must be logged in to post a comment Login





sdircnet
April 17, 2012 at 5:35 pm
Corporations do not pay taxes. People do. When a corporation is billed for the taxes, consumers who pay for the products/services of that corporation pay the taxes.
Perhaps, instead of always wanting a larger piece of Big Brother’s” pie, we should look for ways to keep the ingreients closer to home.
Federal government should not be in the business of designing, mandating, funding, defunding and dictating education and it’s content.
U.S. government is completely upside down today. Local should be larger than State, which should be larger then Federal. Stop feeding the monster.
computerhead
April 18, 2012 at 3:36 pm
Corporations do not pay taxes. They pay lobbyists
to ensure that working people pay the highest tax
rates. A little research will show a number of corporations who pay more in lobbying fees than taxes.