Register |  Lost Password?
eSchool News

Web literacy: Where the Common Core meets common sense

We believe it’s essential for every teacher to develop lessons that challenge students to learn how to verify sources; here’s one example

“To ensure that students learn the grammar and strategies of the web, we believe it’s essential for every teacher to develop lessons that challenge students to learn how to verify sources,” the authors write.

(Editor’s note: This is Part Two of a series of articles on developing web literacy among students. To read Part One, click here.)

Are you as worried as we are that the overall impact of technology on our children’s ability to solve complex research problems is negative? Have you heard a child near you say, “Just Google it,” when asked to describe the meaning of life?

Research shows that students primarily use one search engine and then only look at the first page of results. They can quickly give up or settle for something “close enough” when they don’t find the information they’re looking for. Huge amounts of time are being wasted in searches void of the rigor of research.

A very depressing view of the state of American students’ approach to internet research comes from a recent op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal. When challenged, Yale students in Mr. Brill’s advanced journalism class wrote essays describing that they would simply use Google to solve the Watergate scandal by keying in words such as “secret fund.” After New York University journalism professor Jay Rosen heard about this, he posted on Facebook, “I don’t believe this anecdote about moronic Yale students. … It sounds made-up or very, very distorted.” In other communications, Bob Woodward, one of the individuals who broke the Watergate story, wrote to Mr. Brill after reading the essays, “…your students have what I can only call a heart-stopping overconfidence in the quality of the information on the internet.”

Attend Alan November’s ed-tech conference and get $100 off the cost of registration!

For more information about Building Learning Communities 2012, to be held in Boston July 15-20, click here. Get $100 off the cost of registration when you enter the promo code eSchoolMedia12.

Somehow, we do not think this problem is limited to the students admitted to Yale. We believe we have an endemic problem across the country, where our students have weaker research skills as a result of not being taught the rigor and discipline of using Google and other search tools across the curriculum in all grade levels. To paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, being an excellent researcher with print does not automatically make you thorough in a different medium, the web.

The K-12 students we ask (and the majority of our doctoral students) confidently explain that they know how to use Google. Then we start giving them research questions, such as searching for teacher websites in England that cover the American Revolution. When they cannot generate a single teacher website from the U.K., they discover they really do not understand the architecture of information on the web. Our general analysis is that our students don’t know that they don’t know. We probably would be better off if they knew that they did not know. Then, at least, they might ask their teachers for help with their internet research skills.

There are two driving forces that create an urgency to redefine what it means to be literate in today’s world: common sense and the Common Core. Common-sense observations demonstrate how students are misusing the web for their homework and everyday research. They typically do not realize why or how they are getting their results. As Woodward put it, they believed that “somehow the internet was a magic lantern that lit up all events.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
1  2  3  Next >  

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Comment:

  1. mdonlin69

    May 29, 2012 at 7:00 pm

    Several thoughts come to mind in reading Parts 1 & 2 of this article:
    1. Thank you for acknowledging that digital literacy IS a vital component of Common Core Standards.
    2. However, we need to spend a bit more time on the safety issue raised briefly in Part 1:
    a. There is a nod toward CIPA; CIPA requires filtering, etc.
    b. Agreed that all too often, schools have come to rely on their required filter to keep students “safe.”
    c. However, CIPA is ERate connected. That implies money.
    d. The Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act now requires that school boards update their Internet Use policies by July 1, 2012, to indicate that they teach Internet safety – appropriate uses of social networking sites, chat rooms and cyberbullying awareness and response. (The Act includes mandated policy language.) This, is Erate compliance language, now.
    e. The FCC did, also, as you indicate, say that schools do not have to block SN sites. However, there is a danger in simply opening the option up without proper preparation – for educators.
    f. Ultimately, along with digital literacy, we have to be sure to include risk/protection and prevention/intervention into everything we do.
    g. These are not necessarily within the usual conversations around digital literacy. But they need to be.
    There is a lot of information and a variety of resources on the WA SChool Safety Center web site – both with the Bullying and Harassment and Internet Safety sections. http://www.k12.wa.us/safetycenter/default.aspx .

    Thanks,
    Mike Donlin


vitamin c serum hyaluronic acid | Jalousien Rieper | optimise online