Register |  Lost Password?
Facebook twitter Linked in
July 3rd, 2012
Post to Twitter
Email Email   

Peru’s ambitious laptop program gets mixed grades

Technology delivered with no prep or internet leads some to ask ‘Was it worth it?’

Negroponte plans to parachute tablet computers from helicopters, limiting the involvement of adults and educators.

Peru’s equipping of more than 800,000 public schoolchildren in this rugged Andean nation with low-cost laptops ranks among the world’s most ambitious efforts to leverage digital technology in the fight against poverty.

Yet five years in, there are serious doubts about whether the largest single deployment in the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) initiative inspired by MIT Media Lab founder Nicholas Negroponte was worth the more than $200 million that Peru’s government spent.

Ill-prepared rural teachers and administrators were too often unable to fathom–much less teach–with the machines, software bugs didn’t get fixed, internet access was almost universally absent and cultural disconnects kept kids from benefitting from the machines.

“In essence, what we did was deliver the computers without preparing the teachers,” said Sandro Marcone, the Peruvian education official who now runs the program.

He believes the missteps may have actually widened the gap between children able to benefit from the computers and those ill-equipped to do so, he says, in a country whose public education system is rated among the world’s most deficient.

The volume of “education” computers delivered globally remains modest. Intel Corp. says it has shipped more than 7 million, about a third in Argentina. Venezuela boasts 1.6 million distributed, licensed by a Portuguese company.

Negroponte’s nonprofit OLPC foundation, which pioneered the idea of bootstrapping the developing world with information technology, was never able to achieve the $100 laptop price tag it desired but nevertheless won adherents.

More than 2.5 million of its $200 laptops, not just the green-and-white models for the early grades but also blue-and-white machines with bigger keyboards for older kids, have been distributed in 46 countries since 2007.

OLPC laptops, which are rugged and energy efficient and run an open-source variant of the Linux operating system, are in Ethiopia, Rwanda, Mongolia and Haiti, and even in the United States and Australia. Uruguay, a compact South American nation of 3.5 million people, is the only country that has fully embraced the concept and given every elementary school child and teacher an XO laptop, as the machines are called.

No country, however, bought nearly as many as Peru.

“It’s a really great idea,” said Jeff Patzer, a software engineer with a degree from the University of California at Berkeley who traveled from school to school in Peru’s rustic Cordillera Blanca highlands in 2010 introducing and maintaining the laptops. “It just seems like there was some stuff that wasn’t thought through quite enough.”

Inter-American Development Bank researchers were less polite.

“There is little solid evidence regarding the effectiveness of this program,” they said in a study sharply critical of the overall OLPC initiative that was based on a 15-month study at 319 schools in small, rural Peruvian communities that got laptops.

“The magical thinking that mere technology is enough to spur change, to improve learning, is what this study categorically disproves,” co-author Eugenio Severin of Chile told the Associated Press.

The study found no increased math or language skills, no improvement in classroom instruction quality, no boost in time spent on homework, no improvement in reading habits.

3 Responses to Peru’s ambitious laptop program gets mixed grades

  1. rkfglblstar

    July 3, 2012 at 7:00 pm

    The stark difference in success between the programs in Peru and Uruguay illustrate the need to have a certain minimum foundation in place for a program like this. In most of these situations, the program is like selling jet fighters to people that do not know how to fly airplanes. The education community, including the parents, must be up to speed about how a computer works, and how to maintain it. The children may be able to figure out how to learn from the computers, but, apparently, they usually do not control the ownership. There is a huge difference between the MIT world and Third World countries. I think a significant disconnect was present when the reasoning behind the program was formulated.

  2. gviller

    July 3, 2012 at 11:00 pm

    Considering that teachers are ill prepared or not at all, and parents least of all, it is very likely that it all goes up in political smoke.
    It looks and sounds very good for governments and politicians to take on projects like this, and greedy officials and suppliers know so; but if no firm scaffolding is in place to produce the desired results, the learning curve is surpassed by frustration and soon enough it turns into wasted effort.
    A project, as this one, requires at the least the creation of digitally sufficient strategically located centers, with well prepared facilitators to create and develop a powerful learning network within reach of every community. If Teachers and parents aren’t included, the chance for children and teens to overcome the digital challenge is very small.

  3. Tomsmcdonald

    July 6, 2012 at 7:04 pm

    Its no surprise that there were mixed results.

    Access to information alone does not equate to long term individual learning, learning transfer and appropriate learning application. Look at the research on one to many lecture.

    Without teacher facilitated, brain based, research proven, market proven, learning methodology, there is not effective and efficient individual learning, recall and appropriately applied learned information.

    No where in this article has pedagogy been mentioned.

    We are blindly throwing money at unproven learning technologies, hoping that a miracle will happen.

    Guess what…No miracle happens because we have not integrated teacher facilitated, proven learning methodologies.

    The cool electronic device delivering broken one to many teaching to students faster will not advance individual learning.

    We know this, but we continue to focus on the technology, at the expense of the proven pedagogy.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

My eSchool News provides you the latest news by the categories you select.
Customize your news now. You must be logged in to view your customized news.
Watch this short video to learn more about My eSchool News.
Username:
Password:    
Register |  Lost Password?



photoeditorfree.info is good at editing