Register |  Lost Password?
eSchool News

Bill Gates: The keys to effective teacher evaluation

“None of us who work outside the classroom can do anything for students unless we do it with teachers,” said Gates. (3777190317 / Shutterstock.com)

At the Education Commission of the States conference in Atlanta July 11, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates told policy makers that rushing a new teacher evaluation system into place could be a “disaster” if it’s not well thought out. He also shared the lessons his foundation has learned in studying effective teacher evaluation in districts nationwide.

Here’s an excerpt of his speech…

If we wanted to give the United States the best chance for a great future, and we were allowed to pick one thing to promote that — I would pick great teaching in America’s classrooms. In my view, nothing is more important. That is why helping all teachers get better is the primary focus of our foundation’s work in the United States.

Right now, we are funding pilot programs in five urban school districts, working with them to develop teacher evaluation and improvement systems. This is the heart of our work.

Developing a great teacher improvement system is truly difficult, because there are no models. The country’s teachers have been working in systems where almost everyone gets a good evaluation — and almost no one gets any feedback. That’s the key point. Our teachers get no feedback — no guidance on how to get better.

So the goal of our pilot sites is to answer pivotal questions on teaching: What are the great teachers doing? What are the average teachers not doing? And how do you help that average teacher do what the great teacher does? That’s what this is all about.

Now, let me just say that at this time, we don’t have a point of view on the right approach to teacher compensation. We’re leaving that for later. In my view, if you pay more for better performance before you have a proven system to measure and improve performance, that pay system won’t be fair — and it will trigger a lot of mistrust. So before we get into that, we want to make sure teachers get the feedback they need to keep getting better.

Fortunately, 24 states are now working to put in place new approaches to teacher evaluation and development. Just a short time ago, no states had comprehensive evaluation and feedback systems. So this is a great development.

But we need to remember: A new teacher evaluation system is not automatically a good thing. If states and school districts feel pressured to rush out new systems, those systems could evaluate teachers unfairly and fail to help teachers improve. That would be a disaster. A flawed execution of a good idea could convince people it is a bad idea — and that could kill this push for reform.

That’s why today I would like to describe the features of a strong teacher evaluation and development system — and warn against the shortcuts that could lead to failure.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
1  2  3  Next >  

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Comments:

  1. melissaprzy

    July 19, 2012 at 1:41 pm

    As a Montessorian part of our training is to learn how to observe. It is not simple, but it is quite effective in understanding your subject, how they learn and how you can help them become better at anything. I certainly hope that the text by Bill Gates gains momentum finds a place in our educational system. My fear however, is that the we will fall behind even more with a republican majority government who cares only for the wealthy and the corporations. Do they know they are hurting the future of our country by restricting growth to all of our citizens? Life is not all about who has the most money.

    • meiselsgerry

      September 14, 2012 at 6:28 pm

      Mr. Gates is bright as well as wealthy, and does not have to curry favor from anyone. I accept the motivation he states because he seems to recognize that there is nothing more important to America’s future than a well educated citizenry (and therefore also workforce). I also agree that teacher evaluation cannot be based on a single dimension such as student performance especially not if the metric is just a standardized high-stakes test. However, Gates seems not to distinguish clearly between formative and summative evaluation. The same evaluation methodologies do not serve both purposes well. The two evaluation types have different purposes, constraints, and consequences. To use a simplistic parallel, formative evaluation can help you manage your money better, but summative evaluation is the bottom line of how well you live within your means (Bancruptcy is a clear F).

  2. msthomaslm

    July 21, 2012 at 3:38 am

    While I agree that we should take out time creating a proper teacher evaluation form. I hear very little about administration evaluations. The weight of the world is on our shoulders we not only have to teach children how to learn, achieve and master content, we must provide supplies, food for those that do not have it, teach manners and become parents for those that do not have parental guidance(etc.). Administrators are there to tell us what we are not doing and to force us to do what they want and not what’s best for our students.

    I do wonder why Bill Gates has decided to select education as his flag to fly. What are his motivations? This is the first article that he gives teachers some appreciation. Previous articles have only condemned teachers, their additional education and pay. Perhaps its a first step in finding common ground.


Hotels.com coupon