Former teacher: Unions are bad for teachers
During my years as a teacher, I witnessed more harm than good as a result of the stranglehold my union had on the district where I worked. This is why I became a supporter of Gov. Scott Walker (R-Wisc.). Most of my former colleagues cringe at the mention of Walker’s name, but I admire him for taking a stand against public sector unions, says Kristie Farnham for Yahoo! News. First of all, unions protect incompetent teachers. Under the protection of a union, it is nearly impossible for teachers to be fired simply because they aren’t very good at doing what they’re paid to do. I’ve also seen ineffective teachers keep their jobs while highly effective teachers with less seniority have been laid off. Under union guidelines, if cuts need to be made, it isn’t the lowest performing teachers who lose their positions; instead, it’s the ones with the least amount of seniority…
One Response to Former teacher: Unions are bad for teachers
You must be logged in to post a comment Login





bqcasey
October 11, 2012 at 9:05 pm
It was never impossible to fire incompetent teachers. If this argument were true why haven’t districts started getting rid of all the incompetents? The vast majority of our teachers are dedicated, caring professionals. Unions protect teachers from potential unfairness and provide support. Teachers have been fired unfairly in the past. Most school leaders work with the unions to provide an excellent education for all in Wisconsin