News

Brain-wave sensors: The answer to student engagement?

By Dennis Pierce, Editor in Chief, @eSN_Dennis
January 31st, 2014

New technology could help educators monitor student engagement in real time, allowing them to adjust their teaching accordingly

measuring-engagement

The headsets read the user’s brain-wave signals and run them through an algorithm to measure the student’s attentiveness.

A Florida-based start-up firm called Nervanix is working on an idea that, if successful, could help educators find the “sweet spot” to effective teaching: maintaining active student engagement.

What if you could tell whether students really were engaged in a lesson or activity, rather than just pretending to be interested or going through the motions?

Furthermore, what if you had a tool that could measure a student’s brain-wave activity in order to develop a profile for the type of content that most engages that student? And what if this tool then could suggest specific content to match the student’s engagement profile?

This might sound like science fiction, but it’s entirely possible, Nervanix says—and the company is about to launch a suite of products that will put this concept to the test for K-12 education.

Nervanix was founded by Adam Hall, an entrepreneur who’s no stranger to education. A former investment banker, Hall was the co-founder and CEO of Impact Education for 10 years prior to its acquisition by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt in 2010. Hall then ran HMH’s SkillsTutor division as its president for the next two years, before leaving to pursue his current interest.

He calls the concept behind Nervanix “attention adaptivity,” or the ability to optimize learning by monitoring students’ attention levels—and then interceding or adapting one’s methods when their engagement lags.

This is done with the help of headsets that can measure brain-wave activity.

(Next page: How the technology works)

1 2 Read More »

2 Responses to “Brain-wave sensors: The answer to student engagement?”

techdept257
February 3, 2014

Monitoring could provide needed feedback to identify teachers who are failing to engage their students. It could also be used to promote agendas by ensuring certain messages are presented in such a way as to provide maximum engagement, while others ideas that are less palatable to the state are marginalized. This is a great tool for social engineering. Of course that would never happen. No on would ever pervert a tool that has potential for good.