Thu, Nov 20, 2008 Bookmark and Share eMail this Article Send Print this Article Print Media Kit Reprints RSS feeds RSS
Seven skills students desperately need
Today's students could fail at life, says Harvard's Tony Wagner, because their schools are too busy teaching to the test

 

Primary Topic Channel:  21st Century skills

 

SETDA Keynoter Tony Wagner says teaching to the test discourages learning.

Teaching to the test is a mistake, Harvard's Tony Wagner reminded the audience of his Nov. 18 keynote address to the State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA), because it interferes with transmitting the seven "survival skills" every student should acquire before graduating.

Wagner's remarks came during a forum organized in Washington, D.C., as one way to advance the 10-point "Action Plan" SETDA had issued the day before.

As the Obama administration prepares to take over in the nation's capital, SETDA and similar groups are offering advice on how federal policy makers and state and local education leaders can transform education and help students obtain 21st-century skills with the help of technology.

"With this summit and with the release of our Action Plan, we hope to figure out how to make the steps of crucial change more scalable," said SETDA Executive Director Mary Ann Wolf.

Wagner, co-director of the Change Leadership Group at Harvard University's Graduate School of Education, said economic change will come as soon as classroom and national practices involving instruction change as well.

"A lot of people think the skills that students need to learn for the workforce and the skills they need to learn to be a good citizen are two separate sets. But they're not. What makes a student successful in the global workforce will make a person successful at life," he said.

Wagner said he hears two things repeated constantly by today's employers: "We need people who can ask good questions, and we need people who can engage others in thoughtful conversations."

"When I asked them whether or not they needed students to know the latest version of software, they said no," he added. "They told me that technology moves so fast that it's hard to keep up with. [From] the time students graduate to when they get the job, it's usually changed anyway. . . . [Employers] . . .don't mind training employees in technology--but you can't teach someone how to think."

Wagner, who consults for public and independent schools, districts, and foundations across the country and internationally, said his visits to some school districts have highlighted why state standards need to change--and why teaching to the test is not the way to achieve success.

"I went to visit many science labs in these districts," said Wagner. "Some of them were great, achieved great test scores, and most of their students went on to postsecondary education. But some weren't so great, and here's why: I was watching a group of high school students in a science lab. One group had a problem, and the Bunsen burner was smoking. But they weren't doing anything about it--just waiting for the teacher to come by and fix it. But the teacher wasn't looking, so I went over, and I asked: ‘What's going on?' One of the kids said, ‘Don't know, not working.' So I looked at them and I said, ‘Well, what's your hypothesis?' They all stared blankly. Finally one said, ‘Oh yeah, a hypothesis, that was one of our vocabulary words the other day, but I don't know what it means.'"

 
Continued
Pages: 1 2 3 | Next ››
 
 

Comment now.

Don't forget to check out our Online highlights:
- Discover new resources that help school leaders strengthen their school district inside our new Superintendents Center.
Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/superintendents-center/
- View this week's Student Video News Cast at www.eschoolnews.tv where you can also upload video too!
- Follow eSchool News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eschoolnews
- Add our RSS feeds or our new widgets to any school web site. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/content-exchange-rss/
- Find the latest news in the current issue of eSchool News. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/current/

Surely not either/or for the 21st Century

teaching to the test has nothing to do with education and everything to do with training. That said, I am not sure how anyone can analyze information (6) or lead by influence (2) if the person has no content knowledge but only the 7 process skills presented. Ironically, the people who promote process skills and claim to ignore or discount content knowledge themselves have rich content knowledge... We all need both, don't we?

Posted By: bernard.smith, 2009-01-08 9:53 PM

It's all about the teaching...

Is any of Wagner's points supported by data? Is is all anecdotal? It's not that I disagree with him, but this is an old argument that's been bandied about for many years. You can use multiple choice questions to teach critical thinking skills - if you know how to create good questions and discuss them in a analytical way. A good teacher can teach anything. Training helps...

Posted By: sterne, 2009-01-07 2:25 PM

Content versus how to think

I definitely think teaching content is important! However, if students can not think, critically or otherwise, what good does knowing content do? Curiosity, imagination, collaboration, oh instead of re-listing the seven from this article, yes, these are all very important for survival period. Read "The Last Lecture." Dr. Pausch said much the same thing.

Posted By: bdevorewedding, 2009-01-05 7:28 PM

Teachers must have the same skills

I rest my case.

Posted By: jmartin277, 2008-12-20 10:20 AM

I Agree!!!!!

I agree that this new information generation lacks the skills to think constructively on their own. They seem to struggle thinking for themselves. They live in a class bubble helpless to explore always needing a hand to guide them through things. When you ask them to think through the steps, their response is always what. They appear to lazy to learn the why behind the what.If you could lead me to some resources to bring to a better understan ding of this epidemic. Please forward these resources.

Posted By: pbrown, 2008-12-09 12:50 PM

When will I get to teach?

I have been teaching for many years. I would like to know if I am ever going to get to teach again or if the rest of my career will be spent trying to produce numbers to please administrators, who must please their administrators, with scores to make the cut. Our poor students are being left in the dust while bureaucrats decide who gets paid for the best scores. I believe that students must be assessed and will have to be able to compete in a global society. I am also sure that accountability is a good thing (I would just like to see someone besides the classroom teacher take the hit). So while federal and state departments of education and politicians play number games, teachers and students alike will just continue to play the role of puppets. I just want to be part of an education system that works in tandem to ensure that each child is attended to in such a way that success in the most probable outcome. I don't get to do that right now...how sad for the future voters/homeowners/tax payers/leaders.

Posted By: peekd, 2008-12-04 2:13 PM

teaching to the test is so wrong

If the test is that important that teaching (on paper) follows the rules of testing something is very wrong. Testing on paper is not fit to test all the skills a person needs in a job. Testing on paper measures only some less important skills. Testing on paper is not fit to measure if someone has the right knowledge and skills for most trades. Testing on paper cannot measure technical or social skills. Testing on paper measures if someone will be a writer, journalist or civil servant.

Posted By: jaap.bosman, 2008-12-04 1:35 AM

to Jim Ifer

Have you looked at the tests? I graduated with my teaching credential just 4 years ago. My university professors did not prepare me for the reality of what is going on in the classroom. Our children are not being taught how to be the citizens of the future. Our children are being taught how to fill in circles. I am disgusted with you out of touch educators. I have seen the annual tests for 2nd grade, 5th grade and 6th grade. They are horrendous! The verbiage is confusing; as are the mulitple choice answers. I have heard more than one teacher express that they seemed designed to make it difficult to pass and I agree. Yes, I agree that we need to test skills; but the tests are ridiculously designed. California's education will soon be state run and I believe that is the goal of the tests. I want to prepare my children to be caring, responsible citizens. I can't do that when I am being pressured to teach to the test.

Posted By: cynthiaegray, 2008-11-27 9:59 PM

SCANS redux?

We've produced a generation of teachers since the SCANS reports and we still have the best and brightest finding the challenge of going into teaching to "set it right" (glad the calling is still alive). It appears it will take more than a focus on the required skills and able bodied teachers. We are still stuck in issues at the "design" level - the appropriate level of decentralization (property tax base) and political mandates (no child left intact)...Obama will have an easier time with the economy....

Posted By: bshea, 2008-11-26 2:55 PM

An Evolutionary Perspective for Educational Change

The educational change that is behind today's search has an human evolutionary dimension that needs to be understood. The need is a result of the developments in science and technology that has taken place over the past two hundred years. The base for the existing education system has been evolving over the past six thousand years to serve the human survival needs of agrarian societies where human physical energy was the survival base. Science and technology is gradually changing the primary physical survival need to intellectual. The agrarian survival pedagogy evolved as an elimination process. Intellectual ability was seen as needed only from those individuals with the highest natural intellectual ability. It became an externally motivated elimination process with testing and subjective grading as the tools of elimination. Education is becoming aware of the fallacy of that mind set when children of wealthy or politically in power families were able to send their children to formal education and they succeeded or failed no matter what their intellectual may have been. There is no science of human intellectual development behind the the starting of formal education at age six. The age six was unscientifically believed to be the age of reason when children could be held accountable for sins. In the Middle Ages this is when boys became squires and trained for the military. In 1830 the U.S. unscientifically assimilated the educational elimination process and tryed to make it inclusive for the education of all children. Educators have been struggling with that decision ever since. Today science is gradually pointing to the importance of individualization in education. The most powerful and unavoidable learning process for all life in the universe is survival and it is totally internally motivated. What education needs to do is to get objective scientific understandings of the total birth to ageing process for internal and external motivated formal education. This is the only way humanity will be able to make the transition from physical survival pedagogy to intellectual survival pedagogy. Because this has an evolutionary dimension we don't have to do anything other than what we have been doing. It will then take the historic generations to make the transition. We have already been is the process for nine or ten generations as is today. Even if we could agree upon the transition process today it would still take at least two generations to become significant in evolutionary terms.

Posted By: 512lap, 2008-11-24 5:56 PM

 

You need to be registered at eSchoolnews.com to add your comments. If you do not have a username / password please register here ! Registration is very simple and will not take much time!

 
Already registered? Login:
Username:  Want to know more?
Registation Benefits
Password: