Fri, Feb 13, 2009 Bookmark and Share eMail this Article Send Print this Article Print Media Kit Reprints RSS feeds RSS
Big district dumps grade levels -- for starters
Back to the future: Colorado's Adams 50 tears up the traditional model for K-12 instruction, adopts a 21st-century approach

 

Primary Topic Channel:  Instruction

 

The 'little red schoolhouse' approach of mixing kids of different age levels is coming back -- but with a modern twist.

School districts across the United States are trying to improve student performance. But few have taken as radical an approach as Adams 50 in Colorado.

For starters, when the elementary and middle school students come back next fall, there won't be any grade levels--or traditional grades, for that matter. And the organizational transformation -- to a pattern popular in the era of the little red schoolhouse, but with a modern twist -- is only the most visible change in a district facing significant challenges. Adams 50 is striving to reverse dismal test scores and a soaring dropout rate by opting for a wholesale reinvention of itself, departing from the incremental reforms usually favored by administrators.

The 10,000-student district in the metropolitan Denver area is at the forefront of a new standards-based educational approach that has achieved success in individual schools and in some small districts in Alaska, but has yet to be put to the test on such a large scale in an urban district.

"There was a sense of urgency to attend to what wasn't happening for kids here," says Roberta Selleck, district superintendent, explaining why she decided to go with a drastic approach. "When [we saw] the stats for the whole school district over time, we realized we are disconnecting [from] our kids."

The change that's getting the most attention by far is the decision to do away with traditional grade levels. At first, the new approach will affect only kids traditionally in grades lower than eighth. The district plans to phase the reform in through high school, one year at a time. Ultimately, there will be 10 multiage levels, rather than 12 grades, and students might be in different levels depending on the subject. They'll move up only as they demonstrate mastery of the material.

Selleck and her colleagues are quick to emphasize this is only one piece of a radically different, more student-centered, approach to learning--and it's not the same as tracking, the currently out-of-favor system of grouping students by ability.

Students help craft own lesson plans

The district is training teachers to involve students in the lesson plan in a far greater way than before: The students articulate their goals and develop things such as a code of conduct for a whole classroom. And when children fall short of understanding the material, they keep working at it.

The only "acceptable" score allowing a student to move on to the next lesson is the equivalent of what would be a "B" in normal grading--a level indicative of proficiency. Attaining step-by-step proficiency gives kids a better foundation as they move on to more advanced concepts, administrators explain. Advocates sometimes describe the arrangement as flipping the traditional system around to focus on mastery of the material rather than seat time.

 
Continued
Pages: 1 2 3 | Next ››
 
 

Comment now.

Don't forget to check out our Online highlights:
- Discover new resources that help school leaders strengthen their school district inside our new Superintendents Center.
Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/superintendents-center/
- View this week's Student Video News Cast at www.eschoolnews.tv where you can also upload video too!
- Follow eSchool News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eschoolnews
- Add our RSS feeds or our new widgets to any school web site. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/content-exchange-rss/
- Find the latest news in the current issue of eSchool News. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/current/

What's old is new again

In the early 1970s, Westinghouse offered a differentiated learning program that provided schools with individual unit plans that students worked on independently and/or in groups according to their levels of ability and initiative. It was a complete, well-balanced program, with text books, supplemental reading materials and audio-video commponents. As students, we loved it. We utilized state-of-the-art technology, such as tape recorders and scanned test papers, worked fairly independently with other students and were allowed to manage our own time. The experiment didn't last long, though. Parents objected for a variety of good and not-so-good reasons. Students didn't have the necessary time-management skills or the self-discipline to make the most of the program. Lots of kids goofed off. Human nature hasn't changed all that much since then. For any educational program to succeed, it needs small student-teacher ratios. Teachers are needed to help and guide students, to keep them on task so they can achieve and advance. I still believe the Westinghouse program was one of the most exciting and promising educational initiatives of our time. It's goals were what we strive for today--and the obstacles were much the same. How little has really changed in 40 years.

Posted By: mosullivan, 2009-03-03 10:52 AM

Standards-Based Grading Does work

I teach at a middle school in urban Santa Ana California and we have implemented Standard-based grading. This involved revamping the way we planned, focused instruction on mastery and understanding of concepts, and made student more accountable. Students keep track of where they are and where they need to be. Our scores have soared.

Posted By: aearl, 2009-02-26 8:15 PM

KUDDOS to putting student success FIRST

It is so amazing to see such a tremendous effort to reach out and connect with students in this fast changing technological era. The traditional school model worked for a lot of us but, even in the 60's era there were signs of disconnection. I was so fortunate to have a college professer who was forward thinking and challenged us to be in a model of continuous improvement in our subject areas and in the cultural environment of our students. He provided several opportunities for us to visit and collaborate with non-traditional schools who were having great success. In every case, the communities were aware of the need for change and advancement of student success. It is evident that Superintendent Selleck has done a marvelous job of researching, promoting community and parental buy-in, and most of all gaining the classroom teachers support. Most teachers in reality, will tell us the old system just doesn't fit the students of today's era. This model has it all - built in remdeiation and acceleration - collaboration between students and educators - and I believe it will foster great opportunities for parental involvment. Thanks for being courageous and putting student achievement and success at the forefront. I am so excited for Adams 50 I would come out of retirement just to see the eyes of that one saved student we all remember who was in the past socially promoted to failure. sporter - retired teacher and school administrator

Posted By: sporter581, 2009-02-24 11:56 AM

Teaching with students not to students in the 21st Century

Teaching with students not to students in the 21st Century I am a retired teacher; a 35-year veteran. In my classroom I had 9th through 12th grade students. In my classroom were academically advanced students and academically challenged students. There were all ranges of social, emotional and culturally diverse students working with me and with their classmates. Student’s assignments were not accepted till a certain specified mastery was achieved. The students felt proud of their work as they finished each project because it was high quality and they could use their projects for job interviews. Students were required to help one another, a key habit necessary in the workplace for any industry. Occasionally I meet former students and all have expressed the value of what they learned in my classroom for their personal lives and for occupational endeavors. What they learned helped them in many ways to get employment and be successful on the job. I say yes, go ahead with the plan. It will also help students to stay in school when they feel that they have an active part in their education. I wish high school had been that way for me. I believe that I would have been a much better student and achieved a lot more academically and personally. It’s the 21st Century. It’s about time to leave the 18th, 19th and 20th Century pedagogy behind and get students more intimately involved in their schooling. Best of luck to Colorado's Adams 50. Robert J. Barta. Retired Seattle, WA. School District.

Posted By: robert barta, 2009-02-23 9:31 PM

Have no Fear

As a principal who implemented flexible grouping, K-12, just think about it...some kids learn faster than others, some slower, but most learn at the same rate. This allows any student to move up as needed in individual subject areas where they have a strength (yeah! for the gifted kids) or stay where they are working at a slower pace and yet still be successful. Grade levels are only superficial creations of man and can be removed without much problem. Most of the outcry will be from parents who are used to the "old" way of doing it! Kids will love it! As far as social issues, kids will pretty much identify with others of their same social/emotional age. Very few, if any, students will be in school all day at the highest or lowest levels...most students will spend most of the day with students in their age group. So I say...it's about time!!!

Posted By: jmacfarland, 2009-02-17 9:39 AM

Something had to be done

Something radical does need to be done. This is like differentiation by readiness on a campus-wide scale. I do wonder, however, if problems might arise when younger students advance to higher levels. What is being done to address the differences in social and emotional development that will surely manifest themselves?

Posted By: theotherglinda, 2009-02-17 1:05 AM

Smart Kids as Assistant Teachers

As a parent of gifted children and a former teacher of the gifted, this paragraph makes me wary: 'On one recent day, classwork includes a quiz on telling time. Namba is having the only student who received a perfect score help some of the others. "Cristian knows how to tell time," he explains. "He's available to help others." ' While it is certainly fine to let children help each other, teachers need to be vigilant about offering each child material at the correct level. Gifted students or hard-working achievers should not be used as unpaid aides.

Posted By: lauralynnwalsh, 2009-02-16 5:26 PM

Good News!

To a retired teacher who thought that education would never again return to individualization and child-centered approaches to learning, this is GOOD NEWS! Look forward to hearing more about how this is working. Is there a newsletter?

Posted By: apembert, 2009-02-16 3:51 PM

Good start...

I think it is a great start. This will address the learning pace that varies among students. But it's not such a radical change - teachers have always had the ability to keep a student behind to repeat a grade. What still has not been considered is the differences in learning styles. Clay Christensen's latest book, Disrupting Class, reminds us that students have different learning styles. Having the student repeat the same grade under the same teaching style is less than optimal. Successful education reform should empower teachers to deliver individualized student-centric content.

Posted By: clatms, 2009-02-16 3:35 PM

Way Back to the Future

When I was in Junior College, this was the way my college taught Math/Algebra. That was in 1971. It worked for me and I was not good in Algebra. It got me through College math. When I had to take Graduate Level Statistics 15 yrs.later, I bought a remedial algebra book and retaught myself the same way just to keep up. It worked!!!

Posted By: patty538, 2009-02-16 2:50 PM

 

You need to be registered at eSchoolnews.com to add your comments. If you do not have a username / password please register here ! Registration is very simple and will not take much time!

 
Already registered? Login:
Username:  Want to know more?
Registation Benefits
Password: