Thu, Dec 13, 2007 Bookmark and Share eMail this Article Send Print this Article Print Media Kit Reprints RSS feeds RSS
Key states take up evolution debate
Texas, Florida are latest battlegrounds in conflict over teaching of evolution

 

Primary Topic Channel:  Science

 

Educators and textbook publishers are closely watching as two of the nation's largest states revise their science standards.
The perpetually contentious debate over evolution in the nation’s schools is growing louder in two big states, each of which exerts enormous influence over the multibillion-dollar textbook industry and ultimately, therefore, over curricula and science instruction from coast to coast.

In Texas, biology professors have rallied in support of a state official who says she was forced to resign because she sent an eMail message promoting a lecture that was critical of intelligent design. The controversy comes as science standards in Texas are due for a 10-year review in 2008.

And in Florida, state officials are poised to adopt new science standards that would use the term “evolution” for the first time—although the new draft standards have drawn a flood of public comments, many of which are critical of the proposed changes.

How these debates play out in such key battleground states has huge implications for the nation’s students, at a time when many believe science teaching in the United States is facing something of a crisis.

U.S. students were outperformed, on average, by 16 other industrialized countries in science on a recent international exam, sparking new calls to improve math and science instruction to keep the nation competitive in the global economy.

It’s widely accepted within the scientific community that evolution is the foundation for all biological studies. And that was the gist of a letter stressing the importance of teaching students about evolution, sent by biology professors from across Texas to Texas Education Commissioner Robert Scott on Dec. 10.

“It is inappropriate to expect the [Texas Education Agency’s] director of science curriculum to ‘remain neutral’ on this subject, any more than astronomy teachers should ‘remain neutral’ about whether the Earth goes around the sun,” the letter stated.

“Far from remaining neutral, it is the clear duty of the science staff at TEA and all other Texas educators to speak out unequivocally: evolution is a central pillar in any modern science education, while ‘intelligent design’ is a religious idea that deserves no place in the science classroom at all.”

More than 100 faculty members from the universities of Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Texas State, North Texas, Houston, Rice, and Baylor signed the letter.

“I’m an evolutionary biologist, and I and many others simply feel that good evolution education is key to understanding biology as a whole,” said Daniel Bolnick of the University of Texas (UT), who started collecting signatures last week.

The professors sent the letter in response to the departure of long-time education veteran Chris Comer, who said evolution politics were behind her forced resignation last month as the state’s director of science curriculum.

 
Continued
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Next ››
 
 

Comment now.

Don't forget to check out our Online highlights:
- Discover new resources that help school leaders strengthen their school district inside our new Superintendents Center.
Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/superintendents-center/
- View this week's Student Video News Cast at www.eschoolnews.tv where you can also upload video too!
- Follow eSchool News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eschoolnews
- Add our RSS feeds or our new widgets to any school web site. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/content-exchange-rss/
- Find the latest news in the current issue of eSchool News. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/current/

School choice may decide

There is a reason Private Schools and Home Schooling is on the rise! Sixty eight percent of parents would send their children to private schools if it were affordable for them. One reason for this is to insure their belief in creation is addressed as opposed to a theory alone. All but five states have some sort of voucher, tax credit program. Soon more families will be able to choose where their children are educated. It is then both sides can be presented, the theory we evolved from a slug or created by a Creator.

Posted By: jwall62, 2007-12-19 9:23 AM

No fear

"What are they so afraid of? Being proven wrong?" Do not confuse fear with the frustration over having to answer the same discredited claims over and over and over again or the annoyance over the lack of predictions, experiments, data, and analysis.

Posted By: zfaulkes, 2007-12-18 5:11 PM

I agree with dot172

Oh, dot172 - great comment! I also find it interesting that groups such as evolutionists that are SO quick to shoot down anything they deem as "idiotic," "offensive," "crazy," et cetera are always unable to listen to the other side. What are they so afraid of? Being proven wrong? As someone with a strong Christian faith and solid belief that evolution is false, I can gladly listen to and respect the opinions of evolutionists and their ilk, because I KNOW my background and can stand firm even in the face of debate.

Posted By: dtetzler, 2007-12-18 10:12 AM

Speaking of "proof"...

In regard to the statement, "Here's a theory: The study of evolution is the cause of a decline in U.S. students performance in science. Can you prove me wrong?" The past three PISA surveys (http://www.pisa.oecd.org/pages/0,2987,en_32252351_32235731_1_1_1_1_1,00.html) have shown US students scoring below other industrialized nations in all categories, obviously something needs to change. Teaching students "theories" not accepted by the international scientific community is a disservice to their education and their future ability to compete in a global market.

Posted By: s.howard, 2007-12-17 8:44 PM

Its criminal to cut off students from real science

Is it? What is real Science anyhow? I thought it was gathering facts,hypothesis,speculation and then making up your own mind in a way that can benefit the whole. I don't want to think we must tell kinds "these are the facts" how bout... This is what we think. How bout' This is what the minds of our time plus the collected knowledge from our past points us towards believing? If it wasn't for those who over the years that took the attitude of no, no that's wrong" then where would science be? WE believed. Believed mind you that asteroids didn't hit the earth that is until it was unequivocally proven. I don't know that ALL holes have been filled satisfactorily so far that Evolution is FACT.. Yes thats where our experience points us but does that mean those of spiritual beliefs are wrong? I don't KNOW that to be FACT either. I know that theres more I don't know that that I do. I know there are no atheist in foxholes. I know it's not fair to take away any man's right not to make up his own mind. Science is only part of understanding is it not? Not the end of Wisdom.

Posted By: paulhinz, 2007-12-17 1:32 PM

That is a hypothesis!

Interesting, "Here's a theory: The study of evolution is the cause of a decline in U.S. students performance in science. Can you prove me wrong?" I think you need to research the difference between theory and hypothesis. This is the same old, same old. Maybe science should use a different word for theory so the masses don't get confused about its meaning as it pertains to science. The term theory is explained over and over again to the public, but there is a distinct refusal to understand that the scientific meaning is not synonymous with the conversational meaning. When I use the word theory in my high school Biology lessons, I equate it with the mathematical term theorem. While these are not quite synonymous, theory and theorem are closer in meaning than theory in science and theory in conversational language. "Evolution is a theory and a philosophy which still waits for solid proof. " Same thing on the use of theory in this statement. In addition, how much "proof" is needed? 1. There is overwhelming evidence for the evolution of the antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria we keep reading about - TB, Staph. Can we deny that evolution is the mechanism of change in these species? 2. DNA "fingerprinting" that we use in a court of law to determine paternity and convict criminals has passed the test. Why can we use it for this application, but not to show the same relationship status between and among extinct and modern species of organisms? 3. Do we deny the fossil record, which upon examination, also shows the relationship among and between organisms? "Why are evolutionists so afraid of the questions?" I have not seen any evidence that evolutionists are afraid of the questions. In fact, the 29,000+ peer-reviewed articles show an overwhelming response to the questions. Most people I know who are knowledgeable about the Theory of Evolution welcome questions and enjoy answering any question in an effort to address the misconceptions. I also take exception to the use of the word "proof", ESPECIALLY from someone who claims to be a scientist. While we might use the word prove in our discussions about science, it is not technically correct. The general understanding of the difference between a fact and theory is also in question. Perhaps we need to spend much more time in our science classes teaching how scientists do science before we address the content. The "scientific method" as it is represented in K-12 textbooks and taught in the classroom has been distilled down to a set of steps that is almost unrecognizable as what a real research scientist would do when conducting scientific investigations. Perhaps this is where we went wrong in our quest to provide a solid science education to our children. I think that the way science is taught with respect to the methodologies of real scientists has been over-simplified to the point that the public cannot help but have misconceptions. Perhaps the way we teach the “scientific method” could be the biggest contributor to the public’s lack of understanding. In addition, I also feel that the second biggest contributor to this lack of understanding is the science education of the K-12 teachers who teach science. I see the same misconceptions among educators as I do in the general public. Perhaps the qualifications to teach K-12 science should be addressed before any curriculum changes are made.

Posted By: nhsteacher, 2007-12-15 1:12 PM

Look at the letters "I" and "D"...

"ID," is the abbreviation for "Intelligent Design." "I" and "D" are also the first two letters of the word, "idiotic." Maybe THAT was planned up high!

Posted By: chemmilt, 2007-12-15 6:27 AM

Its criminal to cut off students from real science

Wrong. Science is not decided in the public square. The current accepted science, which is something that is continuously changing, is decided by an elite - the scientific community. Teach students that each of them gets to make their own "science" and you've cut them off from an understanding of what science is while the scientific community just goes on developing real science. They can role play being a scientist, but the majority of the population doesn't get to vote. Wrong. The so-called "evidence against evolution" is a collection of plausible sounding arguments rejected by the scientific community. The collection of lies and distortions exists only to keep money coming into extreme religious institutions that believe the scientific community is conducting an atheistic conspiracy. Wrong. Science does not have to agree with divine revelation. If you don't understand that science is a Human Creative Process, with all the flaws and limitations that implies, then you don't understand science at all, and should not be teaching it. Wrong. What the average citizen understands of current biological science matters enormously to the success of the individual, as well as the success of society. Allowing dogmatic and ignorant anti-evolution propaganda into science classes will hurt all of us. Nearly all scientific and teaching societies condemn the kind of nonsense taking place now in Texas and Florida. You really should listen to them.

Posted By: apbioteacher, 2007-12-14 12:54 PM

Funny one should ask...

"Why are evolutionists so afraid of the questions?" Do not confuse fear with frustration of answering the same questions over and over again to no effect. More here: http://neurodojo.blogspot.com/2007/12/lower-molars.html

Posted By: zfaulkes, 2007-12-14 10:52 AM

Closed or Open?

Closing any discussion of a theory is bad science. I have read 1000's of pages of evolutionary theory and can point out many assumptions that invalidate their arguments. I have read 1000's of pages of creation science and can ultimately say they are as valid as any on evolution. Why are evolutionists so afraid of the questions? If we are searching for truth in science, shouldn't questioning ultimately lead to the truth? Have you read creation science lately? Until a person studies all sides of a theory, they are not well informed. It is interesting that even quotes in this article(flat earth) are from science 'facts' that have changed continually, not from any religious belief. Here's a theory: The study of evolution is the cause of a decline in U.S. students performance in science. Can you prove me wrong?

Posted By: dot172, 2007-12-14 10:22 AM

 

You need to be registered at eSchoolnews.com to add your comments. If you do not have a username / password please register here ! Registration is very simple and will not take much time!

 
Already registered? Login:
Username:  Want to know more?
Registation Benefits
Password: