21st-century learning environments must break through the barriers that separate learning from the real world, P21 says
Primary Topic Channel: 21st Century skills
|
|
Educators can't truly deliver 21st-century instruction in schools that reflect Industrial-Age designs, with rigid schedules, inflexible facilities, and fixed boundaries between grades, disciplines, and classrooms, according to a new white paper from the Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21).
Sponsored by Cisco Systems, the paper--titled "21st Century Learning Environments"--describes the kinds of school structures that have been shown to facilitate successful 21st-century teaching and learning: from flexible learning spaces that can be rearranged to fit different class sizes and subjects, to more malleable units of time than the typical 50-minute class period.
Although much attention has been paid to improving standards, assessments, professional development, curriculum, and instruction, this white paper argues that learning environments themselves are an essential component to supporting successful 21st-century outcomes for students.
"Schools are being designed for a new balance that combines the best of traditional classroom learning with leading 21st-century learning methods and tools," said Bernie Trilling, global director of education strategy and partnerships for the Oracle Education Foundation. "At the same time, federal, state, and local policies must help guide the creation of learning environments that serve all students in every corner of our states."
With tight budgets and worries over the economy, policy makers face tough decisions concerning whether school design really makes a difference in education, the report says. According to Georgetown University researchers, design does have a bearing on achievement, reporting that test scores can rise by up to 11 percent when a school's physical environment is improved.
With that in mind, education leaders should design learning environments that incorporate movable furniture and walls, connect with the wider community, and enable collaboration, interaction, and the gathering and sharing of information, the paper says.
As important as it is for physical structures to be adaptable, "it is even more important that class time be elastic. Instead of assigning a certain amount of time for teaching one subject per day, teachers need the flexibility of bigger and more adjustable time slots to truly impact learning," said Charles Fadel, global lead for education for Cisco Systems. "There must be a renewed focus on increasing the quality of teaching by [giving] teachers more time and opportunities to plan, collaborate, and work with advanced technology systems."
In addition, schools cannot continue to use seat time as a measure of academic attainment, the report argues. Instead, measures of learning must include thoughtful assessments of a student's ability to apply and demonstrate knowledge in complex situations.
The report notes that the term "learning environment" has traditionally suggested a concrete place (such as schools, classrooms, or libraries), but in today's interconnected and technology-driven world, a learning environment can be virtual, online, and remote.
Don't forget to check out our Online highlights:
- Discover new resources that help school leaders strengthen their school district inside our new Superintendents Center.
Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/superintendents-center/
- View this week's Student Video News Cast at www.eschoolnews.tv where you can also upload video too!
- Follow eSchool News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eschoolnews
- Add our RSS feeds or our new widgets to any school web site. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/content-exchange-rss/
- Find the latest news in the current issue of eSchool News. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/current/
Sounds great but how can it happen?
This article suggests many great ideas about teaching in the 21st century but doesn't give any examples of how to accomplish them. It would be great to have that time to collaborate with other teachers, school districts, families etc, but with everyone's crazy 21st century schedule it is nearly impossible to do. For any great idea to truly be successful, it requires plenty of funding. We all know that school districts are dying to spend money they don't have. My school is very pro collaboration and has allocated a once a week block of time for the grade level content areas to meet and collaborate on their curriculum. It definitely isn't a lot of time but I'm sure many other districts would love to have something like this in place. I guess it is a step in the direction that the article is trying to get readers to go.
Posted By: garciajrg, 2009-02-12 7:11 PM
Sounds great, but...
This would be ideal for all schools to have large classroom spaces, meeting centers, and a more flexible schedule although it's not realistic for some. I am currently teaching in a redesigned school and it's wonderful. All of our classrooms are large and are able to hold many different seating options. Most teachers in my school have their students in groups or in pairs so that they may all collaborate together. In my music room I am able to have centers. There is lecture/boardwork center, a SmartBoard center, a lounging center where students can sit on the bean bag chairs and read and a private room for small projects. I can have 4 or 5 different learning centers going at once. My situation is a unique one and I know not everyone can have this. If your school is going to be redesigned in the future, make sure to voice your opinion...I did and I got what I wanted.
Posted By: vsylvestro, 2009-02-12 6:04 PM
Some Valid Points, But...
I think the article has some good ideas. I think students should have better access to technology, collaborate more with others, and feel part of a school environment where everyone is part of a community. It would prepare students for the future and teach them how to work well with others. The only problem is this is not going to happen anytime soon. In this economic state, there is no way districts are going to allocate money for improving aesthetics. I think they would for technology, but there is no money. The districts in my area are cutting back spending and doing what they can just to keep teachers in the classroom. This idea is good in principle (like many ideas), but offers no suggestions or ways to get it done. Is this technology coming for free? Is the federal government going to spend 800 billion to save the schools like they are doing for failed businesses? I don't think. So I can't take these ideas serious for now. The one idea I did like that can be accomplished is longer class periods. This might mean that you won't see all the classes everyday, but I think 60-70 minute classes are far more effective then seeing a class 40-50 minutes every day. I have taught in both environments and favor block scheduling if you really want students to explore ideas.
Posted By: johnnymay15, 2009-02-11 7:27 PM
not here
"There must be a renewed focus on increasing the quality of teaching by [giving] teachers more time and opportunities to plan, collaborate, and work with advanced technology systems." I feel that we are always hearing this from administration but never get the time to do it. When I first joined the district I heard "technology this and that..." I can't believe the lack there of...Its almost funny but so sad. I also hear -"but you only teach 2nd graders" ahhh!!! As for arrangement of the classroom- It takes creativity- I actually have enjoyed setting up a computer center this year with 3 donated computers- and one in the middle of the classroom hooked to a projector. Now what...No time to build lessons.
Posted By: joeteacher, 2009-02-11 6:35 PM
What's the Plan?
This sounds like a great idea in principle but there are some factors that need to be addressed more. One, not all schools can afford the technology or just revamp the school so there are movable walls and the sort. Two, where the hell is this time going to come from? Teachers schedules are already booked. About the only solution is to add another 6 hours to the day. And three, what's wrong with 50 minute classes. Students today have shorter attention spans so its just going to go in one ear and out the other if they have to be in class in for blocks of time.
Posted By: tlow, 2009-02-11 5:55 PM
It sounds great.
This is a very interesting article because my principal was talking about how teachers should get out to classroom and stop isolating themselves from the world. I believe that schools need to share more with the communities around them and teachers should share with each other and have a relationship after the bell rings. This will make the school a better place to work and a better place for the students to learn. Another thing my principal was telling the staff is that we are going to have less money per student next year and that the district is expected to cut over 300 jobs. So where is the money going to come from to create these 21st learning environment? Why do all these magnet schools get all the money to have the newest and most advance technology in their schools?
Posted By: timfield23, 2009-02-11 5:43 PM
Thoughts...
This article sounds wonderful, if it was only that easy. Re-doing schools to make them more up to date with technology is an amazing idea. But just like many have said, where will the money come from?? In some school districts they need to cut teachers because funding isn’t there. I would agree 100% that the learning environment is key. It’s the backbone to the classroom. A successful learning environment can learn to a more successful classroom. Technology in the classroom and school is important and should be put in. In some school districts the technology in the school is the only exposure some students have. Technology is expanding and becoming a huge part in the world of education and it is important that schools stay current. I also think that time needs to be given to the teachers to prepare them for these new technologies. I’m currently not teaching however, I have seen collaboration work. Collaboration with other teachers is important and can improve the learning of the students. Collaboration should happen but I don’t think removable walls are the answer. But then again maybe it is.On the topic of time, it’s a tough one. In the elementary setting there is a little more flex time to an extent because you have your students all day except when they go to specials. However, there is only so much time you can use without loosing time for something else.
Posted By: blighgel, 2009-02-11 4:36 PM
don't see it here
Flexible school classes ? Good luck with that. Yes, the teachers need more time to be affective, but where it going to come from ? longer school days ? eliminate after school activities ? My 15 year old, has only to get up at 5 a.m. every day to get on the bus. His day is completely full with classes. Kids his age have access to Instant messaging, myspace, you-tube, facebook, cell phones, texting, e-mail, on line videos, etc... More technology to give them will result in information overload. One good idea I have to agree with is the need and implementation of parent-teacher discussion tools for interactivity. For example, power school. I can see his tests, homework, etc right from home minutes after the day is done. Now that's an effective use of technology.
Posted By: bagleyjoc, 2009-02-11 1:15 PM
Yes and No
I have to agree with most of what is stated in this article. I think the concept is great, but far from realistic. I do feel that times have changed and so should our teaching techniques. Too often I see the veteran teachers stuck in the dark ages when it comes to teaching. Everything is very basic and most of the material is what they have been using for the past 2-3 decades. There are numerous technological advances that have been made that teachers should take advantage of. I agree with the idea that many schools need that balance of traditional aspects with 21st-century tools and methods. The problem is attaining the proper amount of funding to support this. Another issue I see is all of this extra time we are supposed to make for all of this. I am all for giving teachers more planning time and space, but I just don’t see it happening.
Posted By: ryan g., 2009-02-11 8:14 AM
|
You need to be registered at eSchoolnews.com to add your comments. If you do not have a username / password please register here ! Registration is very simple and will not take much time! |





Comment now.

It is not all money
The article brings up some extremely pertinent points. I liked the fact that the thrust of the article is not solely on technology and the acquisition of the same. I work in a middle school with 43 three minute periods four days a week and 30 minute periods on Wednesdays. Wednesday cannot be structured like the longer-period days. It begs for some type of monographic lesson. In any event, all the periods are too short. There was a comment on what is wrong with 50 minute periods referencing attention span. Well the problem that research supports is that kids are getting turned around from one subject to the other so quickly that they are not able to focus. Try that with their video games. Let them play each one for ten minutes and see how quickly they get turned off (Hey, sounds like a cool experiment). The attention span issue is not one of changing the academic, but keeping the student engaged. We have a technique in teaching called 'chunking' that is successful in maintaining focus and lends itself to longer periods, more in depth study and better results. School districts are still enmired in antiquated and constraining teaching methodologies and techniques, not even necessarily of the past. The 50s to 80s of the previous century brought many innovative ideas to education. Much of what the article suggests can be done and poses more of an administrative and methodological obstacle than physical barriers; like longer class periods or redistribution of the classroom. However, in terms of time, districts seem to be bent on task inflation for teachers. The yearly increase of tasks is often relatively small, so most teachers do not balk. However, when examined over a period of years, most teachers face a daunting augmentation in their administrative responsibilities. My suggestion is to not be complacent. Check with the Union and speak to colleagues and administrators. Be sure the message is consistent - We need time (and resources) to produce good instruction. Technology is a vehicle to increase efficiency and engagement - both valid objectives. However, to properly incorporate any innovation, teachers need collaborative, formation and organizational time.
Posted By: dondavid, 2009-02-20 9:52 AM