Stimulus package heads to Senate, where differences will have to be ironed out
Primary Topic Channel: Federal Policy
|
|
The U.S. House of Representatives approved a historically huge $819 billion stimulus bill on Jan. 28 that includes some $142 billion for education as part of the Obama administration's plan to revive a badly ailing economy. The vote was 244-188, with Republicans unanimous in opposition despite the president's frequent pleas for bipartisan support.
Some $20 billion for school modernization and $1 billion for educational technology are included in the bill, which also sets aside money for schools and colleges to shield them from the effects of state cutbacks in services, as well as tax credits designed to make college more affordable.
"This recovery plan will save or create more than three million new jobs over the next few years," President Obama said in a written statement released moments after the House voted. Still later, he welcomed congressional leaders of both parties to the White House for drinks as he continued to lobby for the legislation.
The vote sent the bill to the Senate, where debate could begin as early as Feb. 2 on a more bipartisan, and costlier, companion measure already taking shape. Democratic leaders have pledged to have legislation ready for Obama's signature by mid-February.
That could prove difficult, however, because there are differences between the House and Senate versions that must be ironed out.
The day before the House vote, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved the Senate version of the bill over Republican protests that it contained too much spending. Siding with Democrats on the committee in approving the measure were Republican Sens. Thad Cochran of Mississippi, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, Christopher Bond of Missouri, and Susan Collins of Maine.
Despite Republican protests, the Senate version includes a higher percentage of tax cuts than the House bill. It calls for $366 billion in stimulus spending within a total package that could approach or exceed $900 billion.
The House bill includes an estimated $544 billion in federal spending and $275 billion in tax cuts for individuals and businesses. These totals remained in flux nearly until the final vote, owing to official re-estimates and a last-minute addition of $3 billion for mass transit.
Both the Senate and House versions of the stimulus package would supply about $20 billion for school infrastructure improvements, though the funding would be apportioned differently: K-12 schools would get $14 billion and colleges $6 billion in the House version, while the Senate version allocates $16 billion for K-12 schools and $3.5 billion for colleges. The House version also sets aside another $1 billion for educational technology, while the Senate version includes ed-tech funding as part of the infrastructure line item.
There are also differences in Pell Grant funding ($15.6 billion in the House version, $13.9 billion in the Senate version) and support for broadband deployment ($6 billion in the House bill, $9 billion in the Senate bill) to be worked out, among other discrepancies.
Don't forget to check out our Online highlights:
- Discover new resources that help school leaders strengthen their school district inside our new Superintendents Center.
Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/superintendents-center/
- View this week's Student Video News Cast at www.eschoolnews.tv where you can also upload video too!
- Follow eSchool News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eschoolnews
- Add our RSS feeds or our new widgets to any school web site. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/content-exchange-rss/
- Find the latest news in the current issue of eSchool News. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/current/
Compulsory Education - Origins
It might be worthwhile for the representatives and members of the administration who favor putting this needed $$ into America's public & private educational systems (Charter school are arguably a variation on private) what the reason was the the Compulsory Education Laws were adopted in all the existing States between 1853 and 1918. According to reliable, published sources it was because during the "Industrial Revolution" there were re[portedly gangs of "youths" (young men) roaming the streets of America's Great Cities, stealing old ladies purses, ganging up on grown men and stealing everything of worth they were carrying and generally behaving like out of control rascallians and vandels. (Sound familiar to anyone?) If the U.S. Congress want's an entirely predictable set of consequences, all they have to do is block this educational spending and force today's "Great City Schools" to lay off even more teachers and make urban classrooms even more hellish than they already are! A high percentare of the existing school buildings in most American urban centers have so much mythical asbestos (that the districts claim was all removed) in them STILL that those buildings should probably be condemmed rather than remodeled. Too many urban schools are such horrible and degrading places for students to be, it's no wonder that urban high school completion rates are still as bad as they are in most cities. NONE OF YOU WOULD WANT TO SPEND SIX HOR MORE HOURS A DAY IN THOSE ENVIRONMENTS EITHER! If the Republican "opposition" decides to stonewall this bill in the Senate, all I have to say is there's a congressional election coming up in two years!! WRITE YOUR REPUBLICAN SENATORS AND TELL THE TO WAKE UP AND SMELL THE ASBESTOS AND DECAY!! BobBl
Posted By: bobblomeyer, 2009-01-29 3:38 PM
|
You need to be registered at eSchoolnews.com to add your comments. If you do not have a username / password please register here ! Registration is very simple and will not take much time! |





Comment now.
If you don't believe me...
For those of you who might tend to think I'm a "crank" or chronic "bleeding heart educationist/liberal," do a little reading in The Chicago School of Criminology 1914-1945: The Gang: A Study of 1,313 Gangs in Chicago by Frederic Milton Thrasher By Piers Beirne, William Isaac Thomas, Nels Anderson, Frederic Milton Thrasher, Clifford Robe Shaw Published by Taylor & Francis, 2004 ISBN 0415700965, 9780415700962 You can preview a subsection titled "The Gang Invites Truancy" (page 370) at this VERY long URL pointing to a preview on Amazon.com: http://books.google.com/books?id=u2K3ieKt22QC&pg=PA370&lpg=PA370&dq=Compulsory+Education+and+Gangs&source=bl&ots=I0zqFls9Wm&sig=b51zRiL5simU0hzTo_rpmVVwvdA&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result#PPA370,M1 Enjoy! BobBl
Posted By: bobblomeyer, 2009-01-29 3:56 PM