Tue, Mar 31, 2009 Bookmark and Share eMail this Article Send Print this Article Print Media Kit Reprints RSS feeds RSS
New standards to facilitate eLearning
'Common Cartridge' reportedly will allow any digital content to work with any standards-based software

 

Primary Topic Channel:  Student information systems , Communication , Wimba

 

Schools look to save time and money with the adoption of worldwide digital-content standards.

A consortium of educators and technology executives has developed a common set of standards that will allow any kind of digital learning content--such as an electronic text, an online exam, or even a social-networking application--to be used with any type of learning management system (LMS) or student information system (SIS), or web portal.

In theory, implementing this set of free, open standards, called Common Cartridge, would give K-12 and college educators the flexibility to use any combination of materials in a collaborative, content-rich digital learning environment, without worrying about compatibility issues.

Using Common Cartridge standards also would "require less custom integration work to deploy" LMS or SIS software, said Rob Abel, chief executive of the IMS Global Learning Consortium, which oversaw development of the standards.

Common Cartridge aims to solve two problems, according to the IMS web site. The first is to provide a standard way to represent digital course materials for use in online learning systems, so that content can be developed in a single format and used across a wide variety of systems. The second is to enable new publishing models for online course materials and digital books that are modular, interactive, customizable, and distributed online.

If that sounds familiar, it's because many educators and content providers believed an earlier set of standards, called SCORM, would be able to do the same thing.

Developed by the Department of Defense, SCORM--short for Sharable Content Object Reference Model--also aims to make digital learning materials accessible, interoperable, and reusable in a variety of learning environments. (See "Gathering SCORM could transform eLearning.")

But SCORM is a much more limited set of standards, IMS says. While it works fine for stand-alone content objects--such as a video clip illustrating how cells divide, or a PowerPoint explication of a sonnet--it cannot be used to define the more collaborative, interactive learning experiences, such as an online assessment or a wiki, that are typical of today's Web 2.0-enabled course environments.

"SCORM was developed to support [the] portability of self-paced, computer-based training content," IMS says. "This is a very different set of needs than those of digital course materials that are used to support an online course where there is a cohort of students and an instructor, teacher, or professor."

Common Cartridge is supported by a host of publishers, vendors, and LMS platforms, including McGraw-Hill, Pearson, Blackboard, and Sakai. Its supporters say it will allow greater flexibility for professors creating online or hybrid courses and could reduce the cost of deploying software solutions.

Annie Chechitelli, vice president of products at learning software company Wimba and a member of the IMS Learning Tools Interoperability Working Group, said Common Cartridge could be invaluable for professors who teach the same course on different campuses.

 
Continued
Pages: 1 2 | Next ››
 
 

Comment now.

Don't forget to check out our Online highlights:
- Discover new resources that help school leaders strengthen their school district inside our new Superintendents Center.
Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/superintendents-center/
- View this week's Student Video News Cast at www.eschoolnews.tv where you can also upload video too!
- Follow eSchool News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eschoolnews
- Add our RSS feeds or our new widgets to any school web site. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/content-exchange-rss/
- Find the latest news in the current issue of eSchool News. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/current/

Packaging Content vs. building software

Apparently there's confusion about the difference between "content packaging" and software development. SIF is about software interoperability. That's an important consideration when choosing LMS's; which are very complex software environments built on relational databases & scripting languages like PHP. Content from one LMS should be easy to move over onto a different LMS. or "platform." Every LMS in existence (Open Source and Commercial) has provisions for interoperability because the DOD central purchasing agency made a ruling that eligibility for GOV contracts requires content interoperability. (Tip the hat to DOD.) The problem is many commercial LMS providers don't make those procedures "transparent." Content packaging standards are a different kettle of fish. IMS and SCORM are both content packaging standards. They enable content developers to bundle content (text, graphics, digital av resources, etc.) and "tag" it for identification. The "bundles" are usually of .zip files. that open into a folder hierarchy containing html/xml files (&other digital resources) That display in a "viewer" when they are invoked by a student user from inside an LMS. Using a good content packaging tool is a lot like creating a multi-media containing word processing file using Word or the Open Office word processor. Any teacher who can learn to create lesson plans and multi-media lesson materials using Word can learn to "package content" using a WISIWIG tool. The eXe Open Source content packaging tool (from New Zealand) is a good example. The documentation leaves much to be desired. But it works and the price is right. (i.e FREE.) Google eXe and anyone should be able to find where it can be downloaded. Bob Blomeyer (BobBl) Co-Founder and Content Developer Online Teaching Associates http://www.onlineteachingassociates.com/

Posted By: bobblomeyer, 2009-04-14 11:42 AM

SIF compliance

To address cclark's question, SIF is a completely different standard, designed to accomplish different tasks. As such, it's technically not a "competing" standard. SIF was intended to allow different software programs to communicate with one another and share data in real time, so school employees wouldn't have to enter the same student information in multiple programs. SIF defines how school software programs from various participating vendors refer to data models, and it requires a special Zone Integration Server (ZIS) to "translate" the data from various SIF-compliant programs into a common language. To implement a district-wide, SIF-compliant solution requires an investment in a ZIS. Common Cartridge is intended to allow various online course components to work with any LMS or SIS program you might be using. It was designed to accommodate not just software applications, but also social media, electronic books, and any other digital learning objects that might be integrated into an online course. (SIF wasn't designed to handle this range of media.) Many of Common Cartridge's designers also are architects of SIF, but because these handle different tasks, they require a different set of standards. Hope this helps...

Posted By: dpierce689, 2009-04-01 2:16 PM

Technology Needed to Stimulate Students

Great article! I believe any measures that continue to push for the integration of technology and education are good for students. There will obviously be a learning curve, maybe more for teachers than students, but the many advantages make it worth it. I have witnessed students more excited about learning and pushing themselves to new levels by learning on computers. Tutoring programs offer regular book-learning after school. This works for some student, but does not further stimulate many students already struggling. See how technology and a little creativity serving students' needs can lead to tremendous results in the classroom. Michael Davis Progressive Learning http://athome.progressivelearning.com/

Posted By: progressive learning, 2009-03-31 6:30 PM

What about SIF Compliance

There is already a world wide standard in place called SIF which most software vendors are already working towards complete compliance. Why create another competing standard?

Posted By: cclark@acryn.com, 2009-03-31 6:20 PM

 

You need to be registered at eSchoolnews.com to add your comments. If you do not have a username / password please register here ! Registration is very simple and will not take much time!

 
Already registered? Login:
Username:  Want to know more?
Registation Benefits
Password: