Tue, May 05, 2009 Bookmark and Share eMail this Article Send Print this Article Print Media Kit Reprints RSS feeds RSS
Support grows for common standards
At a congressional hearing, education groups argued that common academic standards are necessary for U.S. competitiveness

 

Primary Topic Channel:  Instruction

 

Support for the creation of national academic standards is growing.

It's been a long-held tradition in American public education that decisions about standards and curriculum are best left to state and local school systems, not the federal government. But that soon could change, amid mounting evidence that American students are falling behind their peers in other countries.

Leading education groups and government officials agreed at a congressional hearing April 29 that adopting common academic standards across all states might be the way to give U.S. students an advantage in an increasingly competitive and international marketplace.

During the hearing, Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, said support is building for the creation of common standards, which he said would help the United States close achievement gaps not only among U.S. schools, but also between the U.S. and other high-achieving countries.

"We all know the statistics--we've fallen to 21st in math achievement, 25th in science, and 24th in problem solving," Miller said. "We used to be No. 1 in college completion. Now we are 18th."

Miller said the $5 billion Race to the Top Fund included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act will "lay the foundation" for the changes necessary to move toward common academic standards.

The federal government's role in developing a common set of standards has yet to be determined.

Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), was among the many supporters of common standards to testify at the hearing. Others included the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO).

Weingarten said states "should adopt rigorous, common academic standards so that students can be better prepared to compete in the global economy."

The AFT has long supported common academic standards, and Weingarten said a key problem with typical state standards is that they're often not comprehensive enough to form a complete education.

Many states already have joined the American Diploma Project Network, a program that works to align state standards with college and work expectations, said Ken James, CCSSO president and commissioner of education for the Arkansas Department of Education. 

James said CCSSO and NGA began working with some states two years ago to develop a voluntary, state-led common standards initiative.

"The purpose of the common state standards initiative is to raise the bar for all states by drawing on the best research and evidence," James said. "The most basic way to impact student achievement ... is to guarantee that what is being taught in classrooms in every ZIP code of this nation is both rigorous and relevant."

He added: "States are [no longer] preparing our students to compete with students in the neighboring school district or even the neighboring state. We are preparing them to compete globally and, in order to do so, we must make sure that we equip students across this nation with the learning blocks to reach the same high standards."

 
Continued
Pages: 1 2 | Next ››
 
 

Comment now.

Don't forget to check out our Online highlights:
- Discover new resources that help school leaders strengthen their school district inside our new Superintendents Center.
Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/superintendents-center/
- View this week's Student Video News Cast at www.eschoolnews.tv where you can also upload video too!
- Follow eSchool News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eschoolnews
- Add our RSS feeds or our new widgets to any school web site. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/content-exchange-rss/
- Find the latest news in the current issue of eSchool News. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/current/

Homogenize

The right word for what has been coming from all of the standardized testing on a national level is homogenization -- cut off the top and the bottom and guarantee uniformity. Are we so sure about what we measure when we test that we are willing to put all of our eggs into the basket of one set of standards which some bureau or another will surely want to test to and and then hold someone accountable when students fail. Let's go ahead and standardize the educational system. Let's make it a very tight system with no room for anyone to step out of line. Let's teacher-proof all of it so no student gets anything different from another. The final answer: program the learning into computers. Lock step all students through the system. Sorry folks, but I am afraid that I believe that teaching is an art; it is informed by science, but should not find itself dictated to. If standards can be made to inform without dictating, only then can they avoid the homogenization trap.

Posted By: mcook171, 2009-05-12 8:05 PM

National standards are totalitarian

Though American students' performance at any particular age or grade level tends to be mediocre, that is compensated for by the fact that Americans tend to have more years of education than people in other countries. Having national standards will make it harder for the average individual citizen to influence education policy. Having national standards will make it much easier for high-powered lobbying organizations to uniformly impose their "politically correct" dogmas in such controversial areas of education as evolution and the holocaust. Highly centralized education standards are characteristic of totalitarian fascist and communist regimes -- look at the Hitler Youth, for example. We should be going the other way by abolishing state standards for education -- except perhaps for listing the kinds of courses to be taken (in fact, IMO there should be national standards for the kinds of courses to be taken) -- and going to local standards. It is fairly easy for average citizens to attend local meetings of school boards, but attending statewide -- let alone national -- hearings on standards of education is a big burden for most citizens.

Posted By: larryfarma, 2009-05-09 3:17 AM

Non-Competitive Mathematically

Think globally. We will never compete mathematically using a system that is "second language" to other parts of the globe. To state that "It would be too difficult to change everything" is like saying the rotary phone system should have been left intact (why change something that works). We could join the rest of the world and be even more successful with it.

Posted By: rcrutcher, 2009-05-07 12:30 PM

jtheiser

Even in USA one cannot compare a state with another state. That is the reason we ask for National measurement ( not standardization) National curriculum. But EU can compare countries including USA.

Posted By: mgozaydin, 2009-05-07 2:43 AM

No we do not

In order to compare apple with apple and to show that usa education is behind OISA REPORT and others are created please look them up also

Posted By: mgozaydin, 2009-05-07 2:41 AM

Just give us the facts

I'm sorry but to me this is dishonest reporting on the part of eSchoolNews. To say "Support Grows" is lobbying and manipulative. Just give us the facts and let us figure out what's going on. Jackie

Posted By: jacquelinejleigh, 2009-05-06 4:31 PM

Forgotten word: Creativity

No standards and No standardized test are going to help our youth to be creative, imaginative and with initiatives! We must be concern how to foster in instruction 21st century skills, where reflective thinking and creativity play a major role. It is difficult to think about adding more standardized tests to a curricula already murder by multiple choice standard questions!These tests are not the formula to foster creativity. How are we going to solve essential problems of our existence if we do not teach students to think creative and reflective? It seems the debate is going in a wrong direction, we are blinded by the need of controlling students and teachers, and we do not focus to improve our skills, and our students capacity of thinking.Catalina Figueredo

Posted By: cfigueredo, 2009-05-06 3:26 PM

Why Not???

Why shouldn't there be National Standards? Presently, each individual state has it's own set of standards, then it's own state standardized test that they must administer per NCLB. National standards just make sense. Teaching and learning, of course, are very individual things- how teachers teach each of the standards varies as greatly as how each student learns them. Educational standards don't "standardize" people. But they will help ensure that students in every state are learning about the same kinds of things at the same grade levels and that the standardized tests are measuring what they're meant to. States don't want to admit it, but a "passing" grade on some state tests would be failing in others. While we're at it- how about we make teacher licensure standards the same in all 50 states??? How great would it be if a license from Ohio was just as good as one from Minnesota, or Oregon, or Rhode Island?

Posted By: kaneshan, 2009-05-06 2:51 PM

Hallelujah!

Common standards are no more a constraint on creative and excellent teaching than the sonnet form is on creative and excellent poetry. PLEASE show me an opponent of national standards who is making an education-related argument (isn't a states-rights idealogue) and isn't either protecting their job, shilling for the publishers, or against ANY clear expectations for teaching and learning - or bamboozled by one of them.

Posted By: probertson@schoolone.com, 2009-05-06 7:55 AM

National Curriculum, not standardization

Standardization has a negative meaning. People just do not like it like two persons as above. With national curriculum USA can create the best education available in the USA. USA has the best educators in the world and those education experts' knowledge must be used by the whole country. Now even it is easier to use best knowledge at part of the country through ONLINE. We in Turkey learned the ONLINE from USA and now applying it to 15,000,000 K12 students ( 100 % ) in every part of Turkey. Even FREE. First in the world. Now our efforts to make that online program even better every year. Plus we do not need brick and mortar building any more. mgozaydin@hotmail.com

Posted By: mgozaydin, 2009-05-05 5:39 PM

 

You need to be registered at eSchoolnews.com to add your comments. If you do not have a username / password please register here ! Registration is very simple and will not take much time!

 
Already registered? Login:
Username:  Want to know more?
Registation Benefits
Password: