Global Education Research project will study how technology affects education in and after school, from kindergarten through college
Primary Topic Channel: Research
|
|
A new research initiative called the Global Education Research program will analyze and measure the impact of technology on students' educational experiences in various areas, ranging from first grade through higher education, both inside and outside the classroom.
The program is an initiative of computer maker Lenovo and was announced during Lenovo's recent 12th annual Think Tank education conference, hosted this year at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Although educational institutions have embraced using technology such as laptops, multimedia materials, and interactive whiteboards over the past decade to help students develop 21st-century skills, streamline operations, and connect administrators, a more complete view of the role and impact of technology in all aspects of the learning environment is needed, the company says.
"We saw that there really have been no truly K-20 studies done on the efficacy of technology in all aspects of global education," said Michael Schmedlen, director of worldwide education at Lenovo.
The research also will benefit Lenovo's education customers and programs by helping to outline clear action and best practices for national, provincial, and local governments to improve their use of technology in education, the company said.
So far, there are three main participants in Lenovo's program. One is UNC-Chapel Hill's Center for Faculty Excellence .
The university's faculty center immediately will begin developing and evaluating new faculty development strategies necessary to support instructional innovation. Beginning in September, Lenovo will award grants to UNC faculty members to research the efficacy of technology in teaching, learning, and assessment.
"This collaboration with Lenovo allows us to advance the university's commitment to instructional quality. Improving student learning outcomes in higher education goes hand in hand with supporting instructors by providing them with the technologies and the tools they need," said Todd Zakrajsek, executive director of the Center for Faculty Excellence. "By mobilizing our talented faculty, we hope to contribute to an improved understanding about the efficacy of technology in teaching, learning, and faculty development."
Another participant is the Student Global Leadership Institute at Punahou School in Honolulu, Hawaii. This project will go live in July 2010 and will bring together eight top schools in the U.S. and China to foster a multinational online learning framework driven by technology. The institute will promote leadership development in academics and in public service for secondary school students and teachers and encourage international collaboration.
"This center will really focus on eLearning, or interactive online learning and collaboration," Schmedlen said. "Even though these schools are multilingual and [separated] across oceans, every student in these schools will convene once a year to produce one project on a topic they think is relevant. They will work together."
Don't forget to check out our Online highlights:
- Discover new resources that help school leaders strengthen their school district inside our new Superintendents Center.
Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/superintendents-center/
- View this week's Student Video News Cast at www.eschoolnews.tv where you can also upload video too!
- Follow eSchool News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eschoolnews
- Add our RSS feeds or our new widgets to any school web site. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/content-exchange-rss/
- Find the latest news in the current issue of eSchool News. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/current/
Faculty development.
Technology "has" become the conduit of learning; in fact it allows class rooms to become online with presentations that can be broadcast to any school on the face of the planet. More and more, the students push for information on technology that the instructors are not versed in, let’s start training the trainers, with a better understanding of technology by the school staffs, along with shared syllabus presentations the education community can become a database of information that can be shared and critiqued by others. Studies like this are just promoting emerging technologies, but if the IT and IS staff are the only ones that know how to use it what good is it. The days of the instructor throwing up their hands because they don’t understand it are gone, and as the job market is tighter and tighter the new college grads that are entering the market with a more forward facing aspect of technology will become more and more in need, the old “I have been a teacher for 25 years, In don’t need to learn that!” will be their own downfall, as class rooms become technology hubs, class rooms share events VIA web streams, and interactive VIOP meetings, it’s a new world, maybe if they all try, they will learn something, and provide a better instructional medium for the next generation, IMHO.
Posted By: bertowski, 2009-06-09 7:44 AM
Yes, it was disappointing...
I was disappointed to find no presentation of data and perspectives derived from the "study." I just want to see some data on student performance and what methods were used with those students. All the studies supported by vendors just end up being means to their end of creating products they can sell without backing up their product claims without hard data. Give the facts, mam...just the facts...
Posted By: rickfaircloth, 2009-06-05 8:33 PM
Lenovo Study
Val, I believe I address some of your questions on my blog: www.lenovoblogs.com/education The research conducted will have no predetermined conclusions and will be overseen by education researchers from education graduate programs in the US and abroad. This will be a real, unbiased study. Per the article: "Above all, we want to use these third-party assessments to ensure all the research is valid and accurate." While I understand your trepidation about industry-sponsored research, I can assure you that we understand the last thing education needs is more fettered results from biased assessments.
Posted By: mschmedl, 2009-06-05 3:33 PM
Lenova Study on impact of technology on learning
From the description provided, this does not appear to be a study but rather the development of new programs. Further the last comment "We believe that technology, when implemented correctly and with clear goals defined, can be positive and meaningful for education." indicates the company will be looking to support its view, and promote its products rather than conducting a real, unbiased study.
Posted By: val_lichtman, 2009-06-05 2:17 PM
|
You need to be registered at eSchoolnews.com to add your comments. If you do not have a username / password please register here ! Registration is very simple and will not take much time! |





Comment now.

Technology's Effects on Learning in Classrooms
Between 2002 and 2005 I worked at NCREL & managed R&D in NCREL's Center for Technology. I managed a series of four progressively rigorous "meta-analyses" examined the "effects" of learning in America's schools. Those studies can all still be downloaded and read here: http://www.ncrel.org/tech/index.html An "effect size" is a fractional real number between one and zero. It is determined by measuring the differences in performance between students receiving ¬ receiving a "treatment," in as many high quality, objective educational "experiments" as the author can locate. Published meta-analyses often include long sections on analytic technique, as the statistical analysis is complex and demanding. So the researchers who mublish these must go to great length to prove that they "did it right" to be published in a "refereed" journal. This makes public meta-analyse difficult for practitioners to understand. It is unfortunate because a computed "effect size" is a convenient and reliable way practitioners can judge whether or not an educational "intervention" actually works. The authors of these four NCREL studies, their dates and a brief "translation" of what their "effect size" means follows: Waxman, Connell, & Gray (2002) effect size=.3 - low effect - 20 tech in ed studies selected Waxman, Lynn & Michko (2003) effect size=.41 - "modest" effect - 42 tech in ed studies selected (improvement - more studies reviewed) Cavanaugh, Gillan, Kromery, Hess & Blomeyer (2004) effect size= -.028 - 14 OLL studies selected - "weak negative effect" (suggests learning online "not much worse" than classrooms; few studies were available & some w. questionable quality were selected) Pearson, Ferdig, Blomeyer & Moran (2005) effect size= .489 - "promising effect" - 20 tech in mid-level literacy studies selected from 224 studies reviewed (!!) suggests: "there is reason to be optimistic about using technology in middle-school literacy programs". My "translations" of those effects are overly simplistic and risk alienating authors and colleagues who more fully understand their complexity. I urge educators to learn more and decide for themselves. The Pearson et al study was rewritten and published in the Journal of Literacy Research as: Moran, Ferdig, Pearson, Wardrop & Blomeyer. (2008) JLR.40:6, pg. 58. Routledge. In the final version, Appendix F was included specifically to provide useful information to mid-level teachers. BobBl
Posted By: bobblomeyer, 2009-06-09 11:35 AM