New resources are available to help states and schools boost the number of high school graduates who are ready to succeed
Primary Topic Channel: School Administration
|
|
As education leaders align their programs with the goals set forth by Education Secretary Arne Duncan under the Obama administration, a major point of emphasis is turning around underperforming schools and stemming the nation's dropout rate.
The proposed 2010 federal budget has marked $50 million for dropout prevention work, and the federal stimulus package adds another $3.5 billion to help turn around low-performing schools. How this money is spent could be influenced by a new report from the National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE) that investigates the links among students who are at risk for dropping out, their families, and the communities where they live.
With only 60 to 70 percent of students graduating from high school nationally, the report, called "Partners in Prevention: The Role of School Community Partnerships in Dropout Prevention," holds that schools will reach struggling students effectively only if educators implement comprehensive dropout prevention plans that include strong school-community partnerships.
Developing partnerships with a range of individuals and organizations in the community is a critical step in dropout prevention for schools of all sizes, said NASBE Executive Director Brenda Welburn.
The report's recommendations include:
• Promote community partnerships to encourage student retention.
• Develop a comprehensive student data system that can help identify potential dropouts.
• Deliver the needed training to schools and districts to help them foster effective partnerships and dropout prevention plans.
• Create multiple pathways to graduation.
States can use expanded learning opportunities (ELOs), such as after-school, summer learning, extended day, and extended year programs, to reduce student dropout rates, according to a new issue brief from the National Governors Association's Center for Best Practices (NGA Center).
"Reducing Dropout Rates through Expanded Learning Opportunities" recommends that states identify likely dropouts early and provide targeted intervention through ELOs, increase access to ELOs for students at risk of dropping out, and establish statewide systems to ensure ELOs are effective and are tied to dropout-reduction goals.
Governors across the country are actively working to implement policies and practices to deal with the "alarming rate" at which students are dropping out of school, said NGA Center Director John Thomasian.
"This is a particularly important task during difficult economic times. The steps outlined in this issue brief supplement other strategic state efforts to curb student dropout by using extending learning opportunities to support academic rigor, boost student engagement, and provide students with supportive relationships that can lead to high graduation rates," Thomasian added.
The NGA Center also recently issued "Achieving Graduation for All: A Governor's Guide to Dropout Prevention and Recovery," which provides a comprehensive action plan for states to curb dropout rates, help youth succeed, and strengthen state economies.
Don't forget to check out our Online highlights:
- Discover new resources that help school leaders strengthen their school district inside our new Superintendents Center.
Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/superintendents-center/
- View this week's Student Video News Cast at www.eschoolnews.tv where you can also upload video too!
- Follow eSchool News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eschoolnews
- Add our RSS feeds or our new widgets to any school web site. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/content-exchange-rss/
- Find the latest news in the current issue of eSchool News. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/current/
It is not Rocket Science
Poor graduation outcomes are common across the Western world in schools that draw students from low socio-economic backgrounds. Traditional approaches to schooling simply do not work because they are teacher-centered and do not seek to engage the learners in authentic real-world tasks. Traditional western schooling also makes flawed assumptions about students level of preparedness to learn and age related standards that need to be reached. Students from low SES backgrounds as less likely to be ready to learn at an early age. Their parents often have a negative opinion about schooling which they transfer to their children. These children often are not read to at home and literacy is often not highly valued as it would be in a middle class home. Mix these factors all together and then promote students to a higher grade before they have mastered the requirements of their previous grade and you set these students up for failure. The end result is behavior management problems with these disenfranchised learners and early dropout when it is legal to do so. Extend the problems past the school experience and these former students have little in the way of employment options and a life of crime is often one of the outcomes. The crime costs society and some of these former students go on to perpetuate the behavior and experiences with their own children that got them where they are. Prensky (2005) (http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0553.pdf) suggests "Engage Me or Enrage Me", Kearsley & Shneiderman (1999) (http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm) assert that true learning engagement comes from students in small teams Relating to complex real-world problems/tasks, Creating authentic solutions/products and then Donating these into the real world for authentic feedback. The focus switches from teacher-centric obsession with the "Curriculum" to engaging real-world learning that covers the required curriculum, but does not seek to make it the obvious end goal from the students perspective. Authentic Project-Based learning (PBL) is an approach that takes a fundamentally different approach to traditional schooling. It is working very successfully in Sweden where some of the most impressive student results in the OECD ( http://www.oecd.org/document/9/0,3343,en_2649_39263238_41266761_1_1_1_1,00.html ) and PISA ( http://www.pisa.oecd.org/pages/0,2987,en_32252351_32235731_1_1_1_1_1,00.html ). In Australia, my pre-service teacher education students who apply these principles well, have outstanding results with low-SES students despite the constrained nature of some of the school environments in which they work. As the title of my posting indicates, it is not rocket science. Best, Scot. http://e-learning-engagement.blogspot.com/
Posted By: s.aldred, 2009-11-03 10:06 PM
A Similar Program in Ontario Canada
A Ministry of Education organization called Le Centre pour Leadership en Évaluation (CLÉ) administers a project called Destination Success (Destination Réussite). Publically funded French language schools who are underperforming may be selected to become a DS school. As a DS school, an agent from DS is assigned to work with the school to target areas for improvement, to develop a plan and to follow through with it. At least twice a year, DS schools participate in a regional conference and one provincial conference. At these conferences, successful strategies are presented and shared. New initiatives and resources are also presented at theses conferences. It is an effective and cost effective method to assist schools, and especially French language schools because resources are limited for them. DS has been running for at least three years now.
Posted By: trilliumgirl, 2009-11-03 9:52 PM
|
You need to be registered at eSchoolnews.com to add your comments. If you do not have a username / password please register here ! Registration is very simple and will not take much time! |





Comment now.

Too little too late
High School reforms are clearly needed. The most effective interventions in terms of impact, cost efficiency, and sustainability for addressing dropouts, matriculation into and completion of post secondary education must focus on 6-12. Identifying 9th and 10 graders at risk is simply too late. It's like waiting until the patient in in the last stages of a terminal illness and may be considered educational malpractice. This is a major reason that billions of dollars put into focused high school reform by the private and public sectors in the past 10 years have yielded less than hoped for and in many cases, dismal results. Middle level education's job is to prepare students for success in high schools AND those high schools need to be schools employing the best practices as identified for all learners in the development range of young adolescents. So, support AND fund BOTH middle and secondary reform at the same level and we'll see things improve.
Posted By: ctoy, 2009-11-04 7:36 PM