Thou shalt not vandalize web pages. Thou shalt not shut down web sites. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s MP3s.
FBI agents are spreading a new gospel to parents and teachers, hoping they’ll better educate youths that vandalism in cyberspace can be economically costly and just as criminal as mailbox bashing and graffiti spraying.
The Justice Department and the Information Technology Association of America, a trade group, have launched the Cybercitizen Partnership to encourage educators and parents to talk to children in ways that equate computer crimes with old-fashioned wrongdoing.
The nascent effort includes a series of seminars around the country for teachers, classroom materials and guides, and a web site to help parents talk to children.
“One of the most important ways of reducing crime is trying to teach ethics and morality to our kids. That same principle needs to apply to the cyber world,” said Michael Vatis, director of the FBI’s National Infrastructure Protection Center, which guards against computer attacks by terrorists, foreign agents, and teen hackers.
Vatis and other FBI agents attended a kickoff seminar, titled the National Conference on Cyber Ethics, Oct. 6 through 8 at Marymount University in Arlington, Va. The conference brought together education, industry, and government representatives to talk about teaching responsible use of technology.
Part of the challenge: Many teens still consider computer mischief harmless. A recent survey found that 48 percent of students in elementary and middle school don’t consider hacking illegal.
Gail Chmura, a computer science teacher at Oakton High School in Vienna, Va., makes ethics a constant in her lessons, teaching kids about topics such as computer law, software piracy, and online cheating.
She has argued with students who don’t see that stealing from a computer with bad security is as wrong as stealing from an unlocked house. “It’s always interesting that they don’t see a connection between the two,” Chmura said. “They just don’t get it.”
The FBI’s Vatis tells students, “Do you think it would be OK to go spray-paint your neighbor’s house or the grocery store down the street? On a web site, it’s the same sort of thing. It’s somebody’s storefront or an extension of themselves.”
Chmura tries similar messages. For instance, she asks a budding composer how he would feel if his music were stolen and given away online.
“They do sometimes realize that when they’re copying someone’s product, it’s not just that 5-cent disk but someone’s work they’re copying,” she said. “I think they do come to appreciate the fact that it’s somebody’s salary they’re stealing.”
Vatis cites a long list of cyber crimes perpetrated by minors, including the February jamming of major web sites such as Amazon.com and eBay. He tries to drive home the consequences of hackingincluding the resources it drains from his center, as officials scramble to find who is responsible at the outset of an attack.
Authorities “don’t know if it’s a terrorist or a foreign military,” Vatis said. “It diverts very scarce resources of people who are trying to focus on crime, warfare, and terrorism.”
Members of the Cybercitizen Partnership are developing a comprehensive curriculum and program for educators to use as a guideline for teaching responsible use of technology. The group hopes to roll out the content by October 2001.
National Conference on Cyber Ethics: Teaching Responsible Use of the Internet