Students sued for alleged digital copyright violations

The recording industry is expanding its fight against illegal swapping of internet content by suing four college students for allegedly offering more than 1 million copies of popular music online.

In lawsuits filed April 3 in federal courts in New York, New Jersey, and Michigan, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIIA) asked that the sites be shut down and that it be paid maximum damages of $150,000 per song.

The RIAA said the file-sharing systems were being run by students at Princeton University, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and Michigan Technological University. The schools themselves were not named as defendants—but legal experts say it might only be a matter of time before schools are sued for allowing illegal file sharing over their networks.

The RIAA said the offenses were akin to those committed by Napster, which was ordered shut down last year after the courts found it violated musical copyrights.

“These systems are just as illegal and operate in the same manner,” RIAA President Cary Sherman said in a statement.

The action reflects a recent trend in which the entertainment industry has become more aggressive in pursuing copyright infringers.

Four entertainment industry groups sent a letter to 2,300 university presidents last fall urging a tough stand on copyright infringement, and in January a federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled that Verizon Communications Inc. must identify an internet subscriber suspected of illegally offering more than 600 songs from well-known artists. The RIAA had sought the user’s identity with a subpoena approved under the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

In February, the RIAA joined with the Motion Picture Association of America in sending a six-page brochure to Fortune 1000 corporations that suggested corporate policies and offered a sample memo to employees warning against using company computers to download content from the web.

The suits allege that the four students stored thousands of songs on a central server and made them available to students, staff, administrators, and others with access to their schools’ high-speed internet networks. The songs could be downloaded using standard web browsers.

The universities said they were investigating the claims. All the schools have policies prohibiting the use of their computer networks for copyright infringement.

Princeton spokeswoman Lauren Robinson-Brown said the school is unable to monitor its network constantly but does take swift action when told of copyright infringement. The school removed the site within 24 hours of being notified, she said.

The legal action irritated Michigan Technological University President Curtis Tompkins, who said he wished the music industry had contacted the school, as he said it had done in the past when copyright infringements were discovered.

“Had you followed the previous methods established in notification of a violation, we would have shut off the student and not allowed the problem to grow to the size and scope that it is today,” Tompkins wrote April 3 in a letter to the RIAA’s Sherman.

The RIAA said the massive nature of the alleged offenses required a strong response.

“This is not an instance of an individual student simply offering up some sound recordings on a web site,” said Matthew Oppenheim, senior vice president of business and legal affairs for the association.

In the Michigan case, Oppenheim said, the student ran a network offering more than 650,000 music files for downloading, in addition to 1,866 songs from his own personal collection.

“It would be our hope that universities are aware of what is happening on their networks,” he said. “The onus shouldn’t rest on any given copyright holder to provide a warning to an individual when something of this size and scope is happening.”


Recording Industry Association of America

Want to share a great resource? Let us know at