JuicyCampus, a web site that publishes anonymous, often malicious gossip about college students, has come under fire from student groups at several colleges and universities who say it is ruining reputations. Now, state prosecutors in New Jersey have subpoenaed records from JuicyCampus in an investigation into whether the site is committing consumer fraud.
Language on the site ranges from catty to hateful and offensive. One thread, for example, on the “most overrated Princeton student” quickly dissolves into name-calling, homophobia, and anti-Semitism.
JuicyCampus might be violating New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act by suggesting that it doesn’t allow offensive material but providing no enforcement of that rule—and no way for users to report or dispute the material, New Jersey Attorney General Anne Milgram said March 18.
Milgram said she believes New Jersey is the first state to investigate the site.
The investigation began last month when a student came forward who had been assailed by posts on the web site that included her address. Prosecutors have subpoenaed information from JuicyCampus on how it is run, citing concerns about “unconscionable commercial practices.”
“There’s an unbelievable amount of offensive material posted and absolutely no enforcement,” said Milgram, noting insults about students’ appearance, race, and sexual history as “just the tip of the iceberg.”
JuicyCampus referred a request for comment to its public relations firm, which said a response was forthcoming.
Milgram also has subpoenaed the web site’s advertising agency, Adbrite, to determine how JuicyCampus represented its operation and what advertising keywords the site requested.
Milgram said Adbrite has offered full cooperation with the investigation and canceled its contract with JuicyCampus.
The site launched last fall on seven college campuses and recently expanded to 50 more, including Princeton University. Free to use and supported by advertising, JuicyCampus promises total anonymity to people who post on it. Many of the postings indicate they’ve been viewed thousands of times. (See story here.)
Students at many colleges have reportedly responded with outrage and disgust at seeing peers smeared. The student government at Pepperdine University in California voted overwhelmingly to request a ban on the site, although the university has a policy against censoring web sites.
JuicyCampus founder Matt Ivester has expressed little concern in the past about backlash from colleges.
“Like anything that is even remotely controversial, there are always people who demand censorship,” he told the Associated Press last month. “However, we believe that JuicyCampus can have a really positive impact on college campuses, as a place for both entertainment and free expression.”
The site seems designed to shield its users from the threat of libel claims.
“It is not possible for anyone to use this web site to find out who you are or where you are located,” assures a JuicyCampus privacy page. “We do not track any information that can be used by us to identify you.”
Mainstream social-networking sites, on the other hand, maintain detailed logs of users’ numeric internet protocol addresses and their posting history.
New Jersey Office of the Attorney General