Between nine and 35 percent of young people reported being bullied electronically, according to a 2008 Centers for Disease Control report. An Iowa State University study found that 54 percent of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth had experienced cyber bullying within 30 days of the study.
The report points to a recent Pew Internet & American Life Project study, which revealed that 4 percent of teenagers who own cell phones said they have sent “sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude images or videos of themselves to someone else via text message.”
And while 4 percent is a large number, the report said, it is not nearly as large as previously reported by various media outlets.
The Youth Online Safety Working Group (YOSWG), which consists of several law enforcement, child protection, and education organizations and agencies, has developed a document recommending, among other things, that authorities “recognize possible causes of sexting within schools by examining school climate and any underlying behavioral issues” and that they “use discretion when determining legal actions.” The group supports prevention education programs for educators and law enforcement and encourages a “team approach” to “combat the problem of sexting.”
Restricting or forbidding access to social networking sites will likely do more harm than good, because social networking sites and the way young people use those sites have created not only places for social interaction, but also “informal learning environments,” the report said.
In fact, students would greatly benefit if educators are able to incorporate social networking sites into classroom instruction.
“Unfortunately, many children are not learning effective digital or media literacy skills at home or at school,” FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said in his presentation earlier this spring of “Digital Opportunity: A Broadband Plan for Children and Families.”
“In fact, many parents and teachers tell us that they don’t sufficiently understand digital technology, much less know how to teach kids about how use it effectively,” Genachowski said.
“Unless new media are used in schools and within families, youth are on their own in figuring out the ethics, social norms, and civil behaviors that enable good citizenship in the online part of their media use and lives,” the OSTWG said. “We are not suggesting that schools allow kids to update social network profiles in class, but rather that schools find ways to incorporate educational social-technology tools in the classroom to enhance learning and provide pre-K-12 educators with an opportunity to, in the process of teaching regular subjects, teach the constructive, mindful use of social media enabled by digital citizenship and new-media-literacy training—using the media and technologies familiar and compelling to students.”
Coordinating federal, state, and local internet safety education and research efforts would greatly help the state of internet safety education across the nation, the group said. Media literacy and computer security should be part of an ongoing national awareness effort.
“The most important recommendation we can make is for all involved with internet safety education to base their messages on accurate, up-to-date information,” the report said. “Of course, in a changing technology landscape, that’s easier said than done, but we can do better.”
OSTWG members include individuals from child safety groups, government, law enforcement, the internet industry, and educational and civil liberties groups. Subcommittees examined internet safety education, protective online tools, online data vulnerability, and child pornography.
- Student well-being is critical–here’s how to support it - May 19, 2022
- 7 facts about the state of edtech in schools - May 19, 2022
- Major equity gaps persist in access to AP science learning - May 13, 2022