Two civil-rights groups are seeking a federal review of public school education in Texas, accusing state school administrators of violating federal civil-rights laws as a result of social studies curriculum changes approved earlier this year by the Texas Board of Education.
The request to the U.S. Department of Education (ED), made by the Texas NAACP and Texas League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) on Dec. 20, contended that the social studies curriculum changes passed in May “were made with the intention to discriminate” and would have a “stigmatizing impact” on African-American and Latino students.
“The State of Texas is failing to provide many of its minority students with equal educational opportunities,” said the documents sent to ED.
The request, signed by Gary Bledsoe, president of the state NAACP, and Joey D. Cardenas Jr., state director of Texas LULAC, asked that implementation of the social studies curriculum changes and new standardized tests be stopped for being racially or ethnically offensive or historically inaccurate.
Other recent curriculum news:
Besides the curriculum complaint, the two civil-rights groups accused the state, the Texas Education Agency, and the Texas Board of Education of “miseducation” of minority students, disparate discipline for minority students, using accountability standards to impose sanctions on schools with high numbers of minority students, and rules leading to underrepresentation of minorities in gifted and talented school programs.
Texas Education Agency spokeswoman Suzanne Marchman said the complaint was being reviewed but had no immediate comment. Gail Lowe, chair of the Texas Board of Education, said she was aware of the filing “but I don’t know the specific nature of any allegations or problems they allege.”
Capping a contentious meeting in May and after months of discussions, the Republican-dominated Texas Board of Education, voting along party lines, adopted a history and social studies curriculum that amended or watered down the teaching of the civil-rights movement, religious freedoms, America’s relationship with the United Nations, and hundreds of other items. Supporters said the revisions were intended to correct decisions by a previous board a decade earlier.
“This is like in your face, like showing the ultimate in disrespect,” Bledsoe said. “To suggest the positive aspects of slavery or to exalt Jefferson Davis of the Confederacy is just an abomination. I mean no disrespect to people who may have had ancestors who were part of that, but it is what it is.”
The ideological decisions by the Texas Board of Education contribute to what 4.8 million Texas students learn about political events and figures over the next decade. The request by the civil-rights groups argued those decisions might have influence beyond the state boundaries because Texas, as one of the nation’s largest textbook purchasers, influences publishers whose textbooks are sold elsewhere.
Other recent curriculum news:
“It is our contention that the [social studies] curriculum changes were made with the intention to discriminate,” Bledsoe and Cardenas said in their filing to ED’s Office for Civil Rights in Washington, and the board’s action “has violated or will violate” the Civil Rights Act and the Constitution.
“It’s not a lawsuit, but it is kind of a potential legal proceeding,” Bledsoe said of the request in an interview with the Associated Press. “We’ve asked them to do a proactive review, to do a more in-depth review in reference to the concerns we’ve raised, and in the course of that review we’re asking that if we’re vindicated that some of the things we get would be stopping them from implementing these standards.”
The civil-rights groups’ request for a federal review also pointed to “high stakes” state assessment tests “that do not adequately test for all relevant and important educational information,” contending the standardized tests given to students “disproportionately fail minority students and ultimately are important factors in causing large numbers of minority students to drop out of Texas public schools.”
In addition, they contended that disciplinary actions against minority students as compared to white students “are grossly disproportionate and unjustified.”