The internet is abuzz with reaction to a publisher’s controversial decision to replace the N-word with “slave” in Mark Twain’s classic novel Adventures of Huckleberry Finn in an effort not to offend readers.
Black educators and scholars are sharply divided over the decision, according to a Jan. 10 report from BlackVoiceNews.com. A sampling of the hundreds of tweets and re-tweets that were posted in the days following the announcement, meanwhile, revealed many criticisms of the move.
Twain scholar Alan Gribben, who is working with NewSouth Books in Alabama to publish a combined volume of the books, said the N-word appears 219 times in Huck Finn and four times in Tom Sawyer. He said the word puts the books in danger of joining the list of literary classics that Twain once humorously defined as those “which people praise and don’t read.”
“It’s such a shame that one word should be a barrier between a marvelous reading experience and a lot of readers,” Gribben said.
According to BlackVoiceNews.com, Syracuse University professor and cultural commentator Boyce Watkins agrees. Watkins said he believes removing the N-word makes the text more palatable for today’s school children and therefore more useful in modern classrooms, the website reported.
“The fundamental question I would ask is, ‘Can you still make the point of this brilliant novel without using this word 219 times?’ I think that you can,” Watkins is quoted as saying.
Others liken the decision to a “whitewashing” of American cultural and literary history.
“I think this is problematic on so many levels,” Micahela Angela Davis, a former editor at Essence magazine and social commentator, reportedly told CNN’s Anderson Cooper. “When we get into really censoring art and censoring literature, we open up a Pandora’s box. If a teacher is not prepared to have a social and historical conversation and place this masterpiece in context, is she prepared to teach that text? When we get into changing words, unwriting history, rearranging art, we start to put our democracy in danger.”
A sampling of responses on the micro-blogging website Twitter on Jan. 10 revealed hundreds of posts devoted to the topic.
For more curriculum news, read:
“Huck Finn noise is crazy,” tweeted user harrharrisonj. “People should be more afraid of their kids not reading than what they read.” Many other tweets noted that actress and comedienne Whoopie Goldberg said on The View: “You don’t have the right to change a classic.”
Even Twain himself was particular about his words. In an 1888 letter, he described the difference between the right word and the almost right one as “the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning.”
The book isn’t scheduled to be published until February, at a mere 7,500 copies, but Gribben already has received a flood of hateful eMail accusing him of desecrating the novel. He said the eMails prove the word makes people uncomfortable.
- ‘Buyer’s remorse’ dogging Common Core rollout - October 30, 2014
- Calif. law targets social media monitoring of students - October 2, 2014
- Elementary world language instruction - September 25, 2014