‘Perhaps the solution is not the proliferation of charters, but rather the elimination of the rules and regulations that allow charters exempt from them to thrive.’
“Learning Leadership” column, April 2012 edition of eSchool News—The American Association of School Administrators (AASA) is one of the oldest education associations in the country. Founded in 1865, its mission is to advocate for the highest quality public education for all students and to develop and support school system leaders.
Our members are the educational leaders in every community in America. Consequently, it should come as no surprise that our job is to represent the interests of local school systems in our nation’s capital. We often find ourselves at odds with a federal government that pushes to become more and more involved in local affairs and with state governments that often will highjack federal funding before it trickles down to the local level.
Our positions come directly from our membership, and we take advantage of today’s technology to survey our members frequently and get real-time responses to what is affecting students in their schools and communities. Indeed, our members often feel that they have direct input into the policy making here in Washington, D.C. Our surveys on the impact of the economy on our schools have become as popular here inside the Beltway as the polls on presidential contenders. We actually think that our surveys better serve the public.
Our legislative agenda and our positions on proposed policy directives are guided by the input we receive from the field. Our beliefs and positions are reviewed annually so as to keep them up to date. Most recently, our Governing Board convened at our National Conference on Education in Houston to approve the latest draft of AASA’s Beliefs and Position Statements in February.
We believe that public education is the cornerstone of democracy and a civil right. As such, AASA aggressively will defend against all actions that undermine public education, such as vouchers, tax credits, and charters that are not publicly accountable.
We are concerned by the inclusion of vouchers and charters in both the House and Senate versions of the bills that would reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and by a number of bills at the state level that would grant tax credits to private charters. This will further erode the financial structure of public schools at a time when our school systems are already reeling from the reductions to the property and sales tax revenue that is their primary source of support.
More columns from AASA Executive Director Dan Domenech:
What public school administrators want from policy makers
U.S. education is still the best in the world—but here’s what we can learn from others
Scarce resources, insufficient talent threaten to sink public education
AASA does support public school choice and charter schools that operate under the governance of local public school boards. There should be a level playing field for the non-discriminatory and unconditional enrollment of all children, including those in need of special services. The same rules and regulations should apply to everyone, and all schools receiving public funding must be held accountable to the same standards. Non-public charters have become the “exception to the rules,” leaving us to ponder that perhaps the solution is not the proliferation of charters but rather the elimination of the rules and regulations that allow charters exempt from them to thrive.
We are also well aware of the relationship between funding and equity. The method by which public education is funded in America is partially responsible for the broad disparity in quality that exists across school systems. We joke about the ability to determine a school district’s achievement profile by its ZIP code, but that is not far from the truth.
Poverty is not an excuse, but it is a reality. The correlation between National Assessment of Educational Progress scores and the percentage of students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunches in a school is conclusive evidence that even the performance of children not in the federal lunch program is affected if they attend a school with a high concentration of poverty.