Critics note there is little, if any, evidence that basing evaluations on test scores will improve student achievement, and they argue it is being implemented at a large scale too quickly.
One of the key disagreements driving Chicago teachers to the picket lines this week is also a central component of President Barack Obama’s education policy: evaluating instructors in part on how much their students improve.
Through its $4 billion Race to the Top competition and No Child Left Behind waivers, the Obama administration has encouraged states to change how teachers are assessed and include data on student growth as a component. That policy has hit a nerve in the education community, and not just among the unions.
Critics note there is little, if any, evidence that basing evaluations on test scores will improve student achievement, and they argue it is being implemented at a large scale too quickly. Those in support of the revamped evaluations argue that far too many teachers are retained and given above-average reviews without any real assessment.
The dispute has now reached Obama’s hometown, and some say it could have an impact on get-out-the vote efforts for him in November. While both of the nation’s largest teacher unions endorsed him, teachers ultimately could become hesitant to get family and friends to vote for him.
“What really matters is whether teachers are going to be active in October and early November knocking on doors, manning the phone banks,” said Mike Petrilli, executive vice president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, an education think tank.
For more news about teacher evaluation, see:
Bill Gates: The keys to effective teacher evaluation
Rural schools testing 360-degree cameras for teacher observation
States struggle over how to evaluate special-education teachers
Technology helps manage teacher quality initiatives
New teacher evaluation framework promises to serve students, and educators, fairly
The Chicago Teachers Union argues the new evaluation system being put into place in the city is unfair because it relies too heavily on students’ standardized test scores and doesn’t take into account external factors like poverty, violence, and homelessness that affect performance. They estimate 6,000 teachers could lose their jobs within two years as a result of the evaluations.
City officials contend the union hasn’t explained how it arrived at that figure. Mayor Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s former chief of staff, said the evaluation would not count in the first year as any kinks in the process are worked out.
Second-grade Chicago teacher Krystal Brown said one of the biggest issues for her in the negotiations was evaluations. She said often students land in her classroom one to two grade levels behind—and even if they improve by a year, her evaluation would only show they didn’t meet grade level.