Self-paced blended learning highlights ‘average’ student myth

Students were tracked in a technology course where all learning materials were available via an Online Learning Environment (OLE) and every student could access the material on his/her own computer. The learning materials were in the form of video tutorials and equivalent Acrobat files (the electronic equivalent of paper) and other support materials.

This supported different learning styles. As it was a blended learning course, students had the support of a teacher, and peer teaching was also encouraged. Thus, it contained the best of both worlds – technology and a real world teacher/classroom environment.

The analysis began in Week 4 of the course, with the students actually starting the topic in Week 3. Thus, almost all students had begun the tutorials. The analysis continued for five weeks, and there were 11 tutorials in the course. Students had to complete an activity to reinforce their knowledge and ensure their understanding of the material at the completion of each tutorial. Once completed successfully, the student could progress to the next tutorial.

10 Peter West Self paced Blended Learning sequence

Thus, students could not just skim through the tutorials; skills and deep knowledge had to be developed.

Student progress over five weeks

10 Peter West Student weekly progress

It was immediately obvious that there was a significant variation in student progress. This variation increased markedly over the following weeks, as can readily be seen from the graph. Students soon demonstrated their individuality, by learning at their own pace. Some completed the learning rapidly (Student M), some were slower (Student Q) and one student was absent due to illness (Student A). Interestingly, because the course was available online, Student A was able to easily and quickly catch up once recovered. This would have been very difficult in a traditional classroom.

In a traditional classroom, lessons are often pitched at the learning pace of the “average” student. In a differentiated traditional classroom, learning materials may be aimed at two or three levels or rates of learning. Is this enough?

Technology has the power to unleash individual student potential. It has the power to allow what is almost impossible in a traditional classroom; students learning at a pace suitable for each individual instead of the pace of the non-existent “average” student.

We need to leverage technology to embrace this possible future as quickly as possible. Our students deserve nothing less.

Peter West is Director of eLearning at Saint Stephen’s College in Australia. He has over 15 years’ experience leading K12 schools in technology enhanced education, particularly blended learning using online learning environments. He can be contacted at

Want to share a great resource? Let us know at