Darryl Adams, DOE’s Ted Mitchell, and more share groundbreaking thoughts
“These are not infomercials,” is perhaps the best way to describe the reinvented interview lineup recently part of ASU GSV 2016’s Innovation Summit held in San Diego April 18-20, according to Casey Green, host of the interactive interviews and founding director of Campus Computing.
In what could be considered a remodel of the education conference to reflect the disruptive change occurring throughout education, ASU GSV’s Innovation Summit hosted a diverse mix of educators, corporate executives, public officials, education entrepreneurs, and foundation officials—and Green, in partnership with eSchool News, was there to capture the invaluable advice and thought leadership from some of the most notable attendees.
Here, you’ll find a sample of the interviews recently conducted during the innovation Summit, as well as a brief description of some of the topics discussed. For even more interviews (more will be added to the current list as we receive the archived versions), visit our ASU GSV page.
Why community buy-in is crucial
Darryl Adams, superintendent of California’s Coachella Valley School District, spoke with Green about his district’s approach to preparing students for their future in a district spread across an area larger than Rhode Island that also experiences a high poverty rate, large numbers of English language learners, and historically low rates of college graduation.
Adams is changing all that through innovative programs, which have included putting wi-fi on school buses (for students’ long commutes to and from school) and a one-to-one iPad program, which works closely with Apple to train teachers and provide structured supports for students. Adams is also digitizing his curriculum — and he’s doing it all with buy-in and support from the community, which regularly uses the ballot box to vote in funding for the district’s goals.
“The real key is having true collaboration and true inclusion of everyone in this effort,” he said. “Our parents believed in this. They knew that the system was not performing as it should be; they knew there were some students getting it — more not. So they were willing to make that sacrifice and they trusted us…. That’s the difference for us.”
Why education’s perceived problems aren’t like paving a new highway
As Green cites recent policy briefs that chide education for not improving quickly enough for the general public’s approval, Ted Mitchell, Under Secretary of Education, U.S. Department of Education, discusses why systemic change and improving student learning outcomes aren’t quick fixes—and where the real solutions might lie.
“These are systemic systems you’re talking about with huge numbers of moving parts, things like family dynamics, social systems, etc. So looking at broad reform in education within a linear model is tough. It’s not just, give us your money and we can repave this highway and then the problem is fixed; though, many in education seem to think the solution does lie within a single point solution on a linear path (e.g. professional development). The problem is, however, that when you focus on a single point, every other aspect tends to drop away! Also, there’s the mentality that a problem addressed means that it’s forever solved. I think there’s real hope in the change management model, where the focus is not on ‘fixing,’ but keeping eyes on what’s going on around you. This model focuses on agility, iteration, evidence, gathering data, and refining practice, and I believe it has real promise.”
Green goes on to ask Mitchell whether or not education is really using data to its full advantage.
Next page: Scaling up from pilots to real projects