“We have a really strong vision for where we want to go as a school system,” Daria said. “We’re adults making decisions for our children. We had a missing voice at the table–we represent students, but we didn’t necessarily have their voice at the table. We wanted to find ways to have student voice at our decision table on a consistent basis, and also use it as a data point.”
Because the district conducted a student engagement survey, district leaders could analyze cognitive, social and emotional engagement to better understand where schools can improve and what they’re doing well.
The results revealed that students wanted the freedom to be more creative during school, and they wanted more stimulating discussions around lessons and concepts. They also wanted more links between how classroom lessons related to the real world.
The survey also showed low extracurricular participation.
“That bothered us. We took a result and turned it into something that we now measure as part of our strategic plan,” Daria said. “Now we have baseline data for participation in all our athletic and extracurricular activities, which now informs decisions we make for resources.”
Daria and his team immediately began creating strategies to improve the district’s lowest-scoring areas.
“It’s one thing to do a teacher or principal observation and say that you observed students not being engaged in the classroom discussions,” Daria said. “It’s another thing to have a data point to support that. When you look at closing the gap between real student experiences and staff perception, now we have data to start a discussion. [The survey results] move the discussion away from subjective to objective. The survey makes the discussions more precise.”