To support our objective of implementing the four domains, the district adopted the McGraw Hill curriculum for ELA. We understood the dire need to bring the four domains to all content areas in an effort to close the literacy gap, so we implemented a personalized literacy platform called ThinkCERCA.
The seventh-grade ELA team led the way in addressing the learning gap for ELL students, scaffolding essential skills by providing opportunities for students to collaborate, investigate, and evaluate authors’ claims and supporting evidence while using speaking and writing frames in an effort to assist students in their voyage from critical reading to argumentative writing.
Using the CERCA Framework, we teach students how to build an argument and develop critical-thinking skills using five steps: Claims, Evidence, Reasoning, Counterarguments, and Audience. The process requires students to examine learning and research carefully as they craft fact-based arguments. Our students’ improvements were reflected in higher writing scores on last year’s Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium tests.
As student writing improved in seventh-grade ELA classes, it was obvious that we needed to extend our initiative to history and science to achieve our goal of increasing literacy through reading and writing.
To evaluate the effectiveness of our school-wide initiative, we now administer quarterly writing assessments for each content area. We analyze student writing samples at the end of each quarter and include norming as a department, using the district writing rubric to determine strengths and areas requiring improvement. For professional development (PD), our seventh-grade ELA teachers shared firsthand accounts of how the new approach worked and showed the impact it had on the quality writing students produced. This year, ongoing PD will maintain our focus on critical reading and argumentative writing.
Want to improve literacy in your school? Here's how
We have embedded opportunities to promote language acquisition in both oral and written form into lessons. Providing opportunities for students to articulate their thoughts concisely and accurately helps them make meaning as they evaluate multiple sources to make claims and justify thinking.
Our teachers engage students in purposeful, collaborative discussions during lessons and help them explicitly enter discussions by providing sentence templates such as “I agree with what ___ said about ___, but disagree that ___.” We want our students to be open to different ideologies and ideas and be able to debate respectfully. Hence, we engage our students in critical thinking by having them determine what evidence they have (or need to obtain) to best support their claim and/or refute an opposing claim.
Much of what our students learn is told to them, so it is critical that they develop listening comprehension. Teachers provide many listening tasks to students, including auditory and video/electronic presentations on a variety of academic topics. We know that students’ listening comprehension improves when we require them to take notes during presentations. Focused note-taking helps students summarize an oral presentation and answer comprehension questions.
With all of these practices in place, our argumentative writing goal for this school year is an ambitious one, to say the least. We will use the district’s rubric to score students’ writing on a scale from 1 (did not meet grade level standard/not college ready) to 6 (exceeded grade level standard/college ready), and aim to have every student improve their writing by one or more rubric score by the end of the year. We started with a baseline assessment in September and will compare those results to a final writing sample at the end of the year. In addition, we will gather students’ writing samples throughout the year to showcase their progression. I’m excited to see how students improve the quality of their writing from quarter to quarter.