blended-education

Self-paced blended learning highlights ‘average’ student myth


Data from a middle school self-paced blended learning class reinforces the concept that variation from one student to the next is significant “If you design something for the average …person, wouldn’t it fit most people?” Todd Rose - The Myth of Average: from TEDx This seems like a natural conclusion to draw, but research has shown this is incorrect. As Todd points out in his talk, research was undertaken 60 years ago by the U.S. Air Force into the average size of fighter pilots. The goal was to design a jet cockpit that would be the best fit for pilots. After collecting data on a range of physical body measurements, a profile of the “average” pilot was made. They then searched their data to determine the number of pilots who would fit this “average” profile. The expectation was that there would be quite a few. The reality was different; not one pilot fit the average profile. There was no such thing as an average pilot. The concept of the average student is probably equally misleading. Data from a middle school self-paced blended learning class reinforces the concept that variation from one student to the next is significant. This data is not a “one off” and has been reproduced many times, in many other classes. (Next page: Self-paced blended learning assessments) Students were tracked in a technology course where all learning materials were available via an Online Learning Environment (OLE) and every student could access the material on his/her own computer. The learning materials were in the form of video tutorials and equivalent Acrobat files (the electronic equivalent of paper) and other support materials. This supported different learning styles. As it was a blended learning course, students had the support of a teacher, and peer teaching was also encouraged. Thus, it contained the best of both worlds – technology and a real world teacher/classroom environment. The analysis began in Week 4 of the course, with the students actually starting the topic in Week 3. Thus, almost all students had begun the tutorials. The analysis continued for five weeks, and there were 11 tutorials in the course. Students had to complete an activity to reinforce their knowledge and ensure their understanding of the material at the completion of each tutorial. Once completed successfully, the student could progress to the next tutorial.

Thus, students could not just skim through the tutorials; skills and deep knowledge had to be developed.

Student progress over five weeks

More News from eSchool News

Want to share a great resource? Let us know at submissions@eschoolmedia.com.

IT SchoolLeadership

Your source for IT solutions and innovations to support school-wide success.
Weekly on Wednesday.

Please enter your work email address.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Email Newsletters:
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

eSchool News uses cookies to improve your experience. Visit our Privacy Policy for more information.