Register |  Lost Password?
Facebook twitter Linked in
eSchool News Logo
July 21st, 2010
Post to Twitter
Email Email   

Forget grade levels: Schools try something new

Some Missouri schools will group students by ability instead of grade level this fall

Schools in Kansas City, Mo., will begin to group students by ability as opposed to age this fall.

Schools in Kansas City, Mo., will begin to group students by ability as opposed to age this fall.

As Kansas City, Mo., students return to their age-assigned classrooms this fall, they will begin to take assessments in math and reading—tests that will determine their mastery of specific skill sets and, ultimately, where they will be placed.

Instead of simply moving kids from one grade to the next as they get older, Kansas City schools will begin grouping students by ability. Once they master a subject, they’ll move up a level. This practice has been around for decades, but was generally used on a smaller scale—in individual grades, subjects, or schools. Kansas City is believed to be the largest U.S. school system to try grouping by ability.

It’s the latest effort to transform the struggling Kansas City school system. Starting this fall, officials will begin introducing 17,000 students to the new system to turn around lagging schools and increase abysmal tests scores.

“The current system of public education in this country is not working,” said Kansas City Schools Superintendent John Covington. “It’s an outdated, industrial, agrarian kind of model that lends itself to still allowing students to progress through school based on the amount of time they sit in a chair, rather than whether or not they have truly mastered the competencies and skills.”

During the first two weeks of school, pre-K to sixth grade students in five schools will take reading and math assessments to determine their mastery level. The students then will be leveled and moved into groups according to their abilities, said Mary Esselman, assistant superintendent of professional development, assessment, and accountability.

“We’ll … incorporate technology through common assessments and alignment to state standards—and national and international standards as well,” Esselman said. “We’re pretty excited about it. We spent the bulk of the summer leveling curriculum and identifying learning targets.”

Esselman said the students will use Pearson’s Developmental Reading Assessment 2 (DRA2) to test their reading abilities.

“We adopted a new reading program because we were looking for a robust reading assessment that isolated individual skills … such as fluency or comprehension,” she said. “DRA2 gave us a level that we didn’t have already in the assessment we previously used.”

The district will select a math assessment program in the next week, Esselman said. The leveling process with expand to other subjects next year and eventually will be implemented all the way through 12th grade.

How the reform works

Students, often of varying ages, will work at their own pace, meeting with teachers to decide what part of the curriculum to tackle. Teachers still will instruct students as a group if needed, but often students will be working individually or in small groups on projects that are tailored to their skill level.

For instance, in a class learning about currency, one group could draw pictures of pennies and nickels. A student who has mastered that skill might use pretend money to practice making change.

Students who progress quickly can finish high school material early and move forward with college coursework. Alternatively, in some districts, high-schoolers who need extra time can stick around for another year.

Advocates say the approach cuts down on discipline problems, because advanced students aren’t bored and struggling students aren’t frustrated.

But backers acknowledge that implementation is tricky, and the change is so drastic it can take time to explain to parents, teachers, and students. If the community isn’t sold on the effort, it will bomb, said Richard DeLorenzo, co-founder of the Re-Inventing Schools Coalition, which coaches schools on implementing the reform.

6 Responses to Forget grade levels: Schools try something new

  1. mgozaydin

    July 22, 2010 at 8:43 am

    Good.

    ” age assigned class rooms ” is a new concept.

    You say

    ” Tests made will determine mastery of skills ”

    I would like to learn the results of the tests.

    Any help

    mgozaydin@hotmail.com all the way from Turkey.

  2. mgozaydin

    July 22, 2010 at 8:43 am

    Good.

    ” age assigned class rooms ” is a new concept.

    You say

    ” Tests made will determine mastery of skills ”

    I would like to learn the results of the tests.

    Any help

    mgozaydin@hotmail.com all the way from Turkey.

  3. Ann McIntyre

    July 22, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    Is there a DRA test available for Pre-K?

  4. Ann McIntyre

    July 22, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    Is there a DRA test available for Pre-K?

  5. bfurst2008

    July 22, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    Bravo. Something needs to change in our school systems. I applaud these efforts. Move slow… celebrate success… don’t give up because of a few failures.

  6. bfurst2008

    July 22, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    Bravo. Something needs to change in our school systems. I applaud these efforts. Move slow… celebrate success… don’t give up because of a few failures.

  7. pixelmamoe

    July 26, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    How does this work for children with learning disabilities whose skill levels are extremely scattered – for example a 12 year old – 99th percentile for word recognition/spelling at a 5th grade level – yet cannot functionally use money, or tell time, measurement? Would this student be paired with much younger students for math concepts and older students for language arts? How would this student feel having to do math with much younger children? I would think he/she would feel like a failure if he was to sit amongst kindergarteners reviewing money and time?

  8. pixelmamoe

    July 26, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    How does this work for children with learning disabilities whose skill levels are extremely scattered – for example a 12 year old – 99th percentile for word recognition/spelling at a 5th grade level – yet cannot functionally use money, or tell time, measurement? Would this student be paired with much younger students for math concepts and older students for language arts? How would this student feel having to do math with much younger children? I would think he/she would feel like a failure if he was to sit amongst kindergarteners reviewing money and time?

  9. strengthbank

    July 27, 2010 at 1:33 pm

    Beware! Short term it looks great. Long term it is destructive for human beings growing up. I have worked in a school where “Students will work at their own pace meeting with teachers to decide what part of the curriculum to tackle. Teachers still will instruct students as a group if needed, but often students will be working individually or in small groups on projects that are tailored to their skill level.” Teachers love it because the pressure if off teacher prep at first. Later, gifted teachers are frustrated because their talents are misused. Problem from the kids’ standpoint is that the socialization piece so needed for healthy relational growth when “working with others” is left out and motivation loses out ultimately because there is no healthy competition and role modeling. This is one of those spurts of “oh, this is working great” that later becomes a sidetrack into an education experiment from which the teachers and administrators do not suffer but the kids, now grown ups, suffer and don’t know quite how to label the “relational” problems they experience at work and in personal life.

  10. strengthbank

    July 27, 2010 at 1:33 pm

    Beware! Short term it looks great. Long term it is destructive for human beings growing up. I have worked in a school where “Students will work at their own pace meeting with teachers to decide what part of the curriculum to tackle. Teachers still will instruct students as a group if needed, but often students will be working individually or in small groups on projects that are tailored to their skill level.” Teachers love it because the pressure if off teacher prep at first. Later, gifted teachers are frustrated because their talents are misused. Problem from the kids’ standpoint is that the socialization piece so needed for healthy relational growth when “working with others” is left out and motivation loses out ultimately because there is no healthy competition and role modeling. This is one of those spurts of “oh, this is working great” that later becomes a sidetrack into an education experiment from which the teachers and administrators do not suffer but the kids, now grown ups, suffer and don’t know quite how to label the “relational” problems they experience at work and in personal life.

  11. CJ Serdy

    August 6, 2010 at 8:46 am

    I am a bit perplexed as to how mandatory standardized state tests are administered. For example, student A is working in 3rd grade math but language arts is at 4th grade and by his age, he should be in 5th grade. How are the high stakes tests administered, does he take the 3rd grade level or 5th grade, or are the different subjects multi leveled per ability too?

  12. CJ Serdy

    August 6, 2010 at 8:46 am

    I am a bit perplexed as to how mandatory standardized state tests are administered. For example, student A is working in 3rd grade math but language arts is at 4th grade and by his age, he should be in 5th grade. How are the high stakes tests administered, does he take the 3rd grade level or 5th grade, or are the different subjects multi leveled per ability too?

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Get your FREE newsletter today!
Receive education technology news and information each Monday with eSchool News This Week