Could these new standards work better than Common Core?

By Meris Stansbury, Associate Editor, @eSN_Meris
December 9th, 2013

New science standards are free of time-crunches and high-stakes requirements

standards-science-NGSSImagine this ‘unicorn’ scenario in education: You take an entire subject–one whose mastery could push the country to the forefront of innovation–and spend years doing nothing but perfecting its standards and assessments with absolutely no looming deadlines or high-stakes requirements. Be prepared to believe, educators, because this scenario is real, and it’s happening with new science standards.

In a recent webinar hosted by the Alliance for Excellent Education, “Scientific Assessments: Innovations in the next generation of state assessments,” noted state education leaders described the enormous potential the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) could have for states and how assessments may be developed from these standards.

“This is truly a great opportunity for states, districts, and schools, because they don’t have the high-stakes national requirement breathing down their necks. States can really take the time they need for thoughtful, effective implementation and assessment development,” said Stephen L. Pruitt, PhD, senior vice president for Achieve, which helped developed the standards.

(Join the conversation on Twitter with the hashtag #eSNCommonCore. Next page: What are states doing with NGSS and what are they?)

1 2 3 Read More »

One Response to “Could these new standards work better than Common Core?”

Doug Cullen
December 9, 2013

Imagine that, A set of standards developed by teachers and researchers rather than content and assessment purveyors. A process that understands and includes time for implementers to refine and develop materials and assessments.
The cynical side of me expect that the testing industry will try to sidetrack or takeover.