“I think if any school is planning such an initiative, outcomes should be defined, and they must be measured,” Morris said. “That said, most of the important measurements do not involve bubble sheets and high-stakes testing.”
“We did not do 1:1 to improve outcomes but to create a relevant/authentic learning environment using the tools of students’ future,” tweeted Darryl Loy.
“That’s an outcome, too. We need to move beyond thinking in terms of test scores, and also measure thinking skills,” Pierce concluded.
To follow the chat thread, and keep the discussion going, search for posts with the hashtag #esnedchat on Twitter.
For more news about one-to-one computing in schools, see:
‘Mass Customized Learning’: The key to education reform?
Tips and success stories for effective mobile learning
Study reveals factors in ed-tech success
One-to-one computing programs only as effective as their teachers
- Abre Launches “Vera,” Analytics Agent Built to Retire Static K-12 Dashboards - September 23, 2026
- Back to school in 2026: The trends shaping K-12 education this year - September 21, 2026
- AACTE releases national framework on AI in educator preparation - September 9, 2026
Comments are closed.