A Texas school district can transfer a student who is citing religious reasons for her refusal to wear a so-called “smart ID” card that is part of an electronic tracking system, a federal judge ruled on Jan. 8.
The parents of 15-year-old Andrea Hernandez had requested a preliminary injunction that would have prevented the school district from transferring their daughter from her San Antonio high school while the lawsuit on whether she should be forced to wear the ID tracking badge went through federal court.
Last fall, the Northside Independent School District began experimenting with a “locator” chip in student ID badges on two campuses, allowing administrators to track the whereabouts of 4,200 students with GPS-like precision.
Administrators say the chips make students safer and will help boost attendance records that are used to calculate badly needed state funding. They say the technology could bring in an additional $1.7 million in funding.
(Next page: What the ruling said)
Hernandez’s suit against Northside—the fourth-largest school district in Texas—argues that the smart ID tracking violates her religious beliefs. Her family says the badge is a “mark of the beast” that goes against their religion.
But U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia on Jan. 8 denied a request to stop her from being transferred, saying the badge requirement “has an incidental effect, if any, on [Hernandez’s] religious beliefs.”
Garcia also wrote in his 25-page ruling that, because Hernandez has worn a previous student ID badge for several years, her refusal to wear the new smart ID tracking badge “is clearly a secular choice, rather than a religious concern.”
Garcia said that if Hernandez does not accept the school district’s accommodation of wearing a badge without the locator chip, the district can transfer her to another campus.
In a statement, the district said Hernandez, a sophomore, and her family have until Jan. 22, the start of the second semester, to decide if Hernandez will accept the compromise and thus be allowed to stay at the magnet school she is attending or be transferred to her home campus.
“Today’s court ruling affirms [the district’s] position that we did make reasonable accommodation to the student by offering to remove the [locator] chip from the student’s smart ID badge,” according to the school district’s statement.
John Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, a Virginia-based civil rights group that is representing Hernandez and her family in court, said his organization plans to appeal the judge’s ruling.
Whitehead said he expects Hernandez and her family will not accept the school district’s compromise of wearing a badge without the locator chip.
Whitehead believes the judge was incorrect in saying that Hernandez’s refusal to wear the badge is not grounded in her religious beliefs and that prior Supreme Court rulings have indicated that government officials can’t be arbiters of religious beliefs.
“To them, this is a very strong religious moral issue. … I believe their religious beliefs are protected because they are sincere,” he said.