When supported by strong leadership, PBIS, implemented with fidelity, has great benefits.

How intentional leadership behaviors can help PBIS implementation

Focusing on the proper supports from leadership will enable PBIS to be implemented with more fidelity

In its call for social-emotional learning curricula to be integral to every public-school student’s education, federal IDEA legislation, and subsequently ESSA, mandate multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) to meet the needs of all students, academically, socially, and emotionally. This embrace of a response to intervention (RTI) systems-approach is one that many school districts comply with through adoption of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS). In fact, PBIS is mentioned in legislative language as an exemplar, albeit states and local districts are free to choose their methodology from a host of frameworks, systems, curricula, and programs.

PBIS has enjoyed prominence in academic literature and in applied settings of more than 20,000 U.S. schools in the past two decades. With foundational research and practices relative to teaching behavioral expectations with positive language, easy to remember community rules, and differentiated levels of supports, PBIS is based on the public health model of universal prevention and education, secondary supports and differentiation, and tertiary interventions for those with intensive risk factors.

Related content: 3 ways technology can support positive behavior

There is much in the way of qualitative recommendations for implementation of layered continuum approaches in the body of research; however, opportunities abound for applied knowledge to be explored and analyzed relative to how to create and sustain effective systems of support for all learners when all three tiers are in motion.

Want to share a great resource? Let us know at submissions@eschoolmedia.com.