The Obama administration on June 18 warned states that it might withhold millions of dollars in federal stimulus funding if they use the money to plug budget holes instead of boosting aid for schools.
Education Secretary Arne Duncan made the threat in a letter to Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, but his words could have implications for Texas, Arizona, and several other states as well. Duncan’s letter also raises the stakes for the White House, which will come under intense pressure from Congress if Duncan does hold back some money.
In the letter, Duncan wrote he is displeased at a plan by Pennsylvania’s Republican-led Senate to reduce the share of the state budget for education while leaving its rainy-day surplus untouched. To do so "is a disservice to our children," Duncan wrote.
"Each state has an obligation to play its part in spurring today’s economy and protecting our children’s education," he wrote.
Duncan said the plan might hurt Pennsylvania’s chance to compete for a $5 billion competitive grant fund created by the stimulus law to reward states and school districts that adopt innovations Obama supports.
Rendell, a fellow Democrat, asked Duncan to weigh in.
The education secretary applied similar pressure to Tennessee lawmakers last month after Democrats there blocked a bill to let more kids into charter schools, even though President Barack Obama supports charter schools.
Duncan warned that Tennessee could lose out on extra stimulus dollars, and it appears to have worked: This week, Tennessee lawmakers revived the bill and put it on a fast track toward passage.
In Pennsylvania, the issue is over school spending, which takes up a huge share of most states’ budgets.
State Senate Republicans argue the economy is forcing states across the country to make up for budget cuts with federal stimulus dollars.
"We can only spend what we have, and the state should not increase taxes when so many hardworking families are already struggling to make ends meet," said Erik Arneson, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi.
Rendell disagrees. "The state must make sure we do not simply use stimulus funds to cut state funding for schools," Rendell spokesman Chuck Ardo said.
In Texas, Arizona, and many other states, state lawmakers are still arguing over school spending cuts and the use of stimulus dollars. Despite billions of dollars for education in the stimulus package, schools nationwide still face budget cuts, layoffs, and other hardships. (See "Schools suffer despite stimulus funding.")
Obama did not intend for state lawmakers simply to cut state education spending and replace it with stimulus dollars.
Congress made that tough to enforce, however; the stimulus law generally does not prohibit states from using some of the money to replace precious state aid for schools. The result is that school districts could wind up with no additional state aid even as local tax revenues plummet.
But Duncan does have leverage; he alone has control over the $5 billion "Race to the Top" incentive fund. And in some cases, he might be able to withhold some stimulus dollars that have been allocated for a particular state.
U.S. Department of Education