Tue, Feb 05, 2008 Bookmark and Share eMail this Article Send Print this Article Print Media Kit Reprints RSS feeds RSS
Budget plan gives ed tech the boot
President yet again proposes to eliminate federal ed-tech funding

 

Primary Topic Channel:  Federal

 

President Bush's proposed FY 2009 budget would again allocate no funding for the EETT program.
The federal Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT) program, which helps put technology into the hands of students in classrooms across the country, is slated for zero funding for the fifth straight year under President Bush's 2009 budget proposal.

And for the fifth straight year, advocates of educational technology will look to Congress to preserve the program, which this year -- thanks to Congress -- will receive $267 million in funding.

"Although history shows that President Bush does not support the EETT program despite the strong scientifically based research results demonstrating significant gains in student achievement, it is still shocking that the reality of a slowing economy and America's lagging results in the international PISA tests have not convinced the president of the importance of...maximizing the potential of technology in our schools," said Mary Ann Wolf, executive director of the State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA), in a statement.

"Data show that EETT makes a big difference, and SETDA respects Congress's continual understanding and investment in this program. We once again look to Congress to ensure that the tremendous gains from EETT will continue in 2009."

The White House budget proposal, which was sent to Congress on Feb. 4, asks lawmakers to sign off on nearly $60 billion for education programs altogether next year. That amount equals what is being spent this year, without an increase to keep pace with inflation.

Among Bush's other proposals for the upcoming budget year is a push for Congress to restore $600 million that lawmakers cut from the Reading First program, which serves low-income children.

The program has received largely favorable reviews from state and local education officials since its inception. But it also has been criticized by federal investigators for conflicts of interest and mismanagement.

Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said there were problems with the program initially but that these have been addressed and the students being served under the initiative are making strides in reading.

The administration also is renewing a push for a $300 million proposal that would allow poor students to transfer to better public schools outside their district or to private schools, if their schools failed to meet benchmarks under the No Child Left Behind Act or had low graduation rates.

Democrats are staunchly opposed to using federal dollars for private school vouchers and have rejected similar administration proposals in the past.

Spellings said it's unfair to force kids to stay in troubled schools. "When they are broken chronically, we have to do something different," she said.

Title I grants, the main source of federal funding for poor students, would get $14.3 billion, about a 3 percent increase from this year, under the administration's proposal. About half of the nation's schools, and two-thirds of elementary schools, receive Title I funding.

 
Continued
Pages: 1 2 | Next ››
 
 

Comment now.

Don't forget to check out our Online highlights:
- Discover new resources that help school leaders strengthen their school district inside our new Superintendents Center.
Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/superintendents-center/
- View this week's Student Video News Cast at www.eschoolnews.tv where you can also upload video too!
- Follow eSchool News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eschoolnews
- Add our RSS feeds or our new widgets to any school web site. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/content-exchange-rss/
- Find the latest news in the current issue of eSchool News. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/current/

There's EXCELLENT research supporting the positive impact of technology on LITERACY!

One of this administration's rationales used to justify zeroing out support for educational technology every year has consistently been that there is "research-based evidnece" available supporting claims that using instructional technology in the schools supports "measurable improvements" in students' academic performance. THIS IS NO LONGER TRUE!! In the next isue of the refereed "Journal of Literacy Research," an artical will be published by Moran, Ferdig, Pearson, Wardrop and Blomeyer; titled: "Technology and Reading Performance in the Middle-School Grades: A Meta-Analysis with Recommendations for Policy and Practice." The following quote is the abstract from that "in press" publication: "The results of a meta-analysis of 20 research articles containing 89 effect sizes related to the use of digital tools and learning environments to enhance literacy acquisition for middle school students demonstrate that technology can have a positive effect on reading comprehension (weighted effect size of 0.489). Very little research has focused on the effect of technology on other important aspects of reading, such as metacognitive, affective, and dispositional outcomes. The evidence permits the conclusion that there is reason to be optimistic about using technology in middle-school literacy programs, but there is even greater reason to encourage the research community to redouble its efforts to investigate and understand the impact of digital learning environments on students in this age range and to broaden the scope of the interventions and outcomes studied." The piece is long, technical, and contains an extensive detailed description of the statistical analysis process use to computer the "effect size." However, it also includes detailed informataion that will be useful to support literacy practitioners in the schools to find and use some of these very powerful technology tools for improving students' reading comprehension. This work was supported under the 2001-2005 NCREL "Regional Lab" contract at Learning Point Associates. An earlier (unrefereed) version of the work is available here from the NCREL website: http://www.ncrel.org/tech/reading/pearson.pdf I strongly urge colleagues to get and read copies of the "in press" refereed version that will be available soon from the refereed Journal of Literacy Research. Robert Blomeyer, Ph.D. (BobBl)

Posted By: bobblomeyer, 2008-02-05 1:16 PM

 

You need to be registered at eSchoolnews.com to add your comments. If you do not have a username / password please register here ! Registration is very simple and will not take much time!

 
Already registered? Login:
Username:  Want to know more?
Registation Benefits
Password: