Wed, Jun 11, 2008 Bookmark and Share eMail this Article Send Print this Article Print Media Kit Reprints RSS feeds RSS
Teachers: Give us better tech training, support
New report reveals continued barriers to using technology for classroom instruction

 

Primary Topic Channel:  Continuing education-high-quality requirements

 

Educators say they do not feel fully prepared to use technology in the classroom.

After more than decade of investment in school technology, educators say they still don't feel adequately prepared to integrate instructional software into their classrooms and aren't getting the technical support they need to fully impact student achievement, according to a joint study by the nation's two largest teacher unions. 

Released June 10 by the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the study--called Access, Adequacy, and Equity in Education Technology--examines the state of educational technology resources and support in public schools across the country, as reported by classroom teachers and instructional assistants.

Although they often have access to computers and the internet in their classrooms, many teachers don't feel adequately prepared to use technology to enhance their lessons, the report suggests. What's more, many teachers in urban schools say they have insufficient or outdated equipment and software.

"Teachers and students should have the same level of technology in schools that is being used outside of schools. How can we expect our teachers to provide kids with the education they need to join today's high-tech workforce without the necessary equipment and training?" asked NEA President Reg Weaver.

The report shows that most educators use technology for administrative tasks, but substantially fewer use it for instruction. Although most educators believe that technology is essential to teaching and learning, they are less likely to use technology when the technology is outdated and has not been maintained.  Educators also say they would like better support and technical assistance for using both software and hardware, especially in urban schools. 

"When you see the overall condition of many of our schools and the support they receive, it is really not surprising that so many schools are lagging in technology," said AFT President Edward J. McElroy. "This is just one more indicator that policy makers need to set a much higher value on supporting our public schools and our students."

More than half of the educators surveyed said they had no more than two computers available for students' use in their classroom--and fewer than half mentioned their classroom as the main location where students work on computers for class assignments.

Elementary-level teachers have more computers inside their classroom for student use, but they are less likely to be satisfied with the software for their students and are less likely to have high-speed internet access in their classroom, according to the study.

Although three out of five educators said their districts require them to take part in technology training, respondents indicated their training has been more effective for non-instructional tasks, such as how to use the internet for research and how to use administrative software. Only 46 percent of educators believe they were adequately trained to integrate technology into their instruction.

 
Continued
Pages: 1 2 | Next ››
 
 

Comment now.

Don't forget to check out our Online highlights:
- Discover new resources that help school leaders strengthen their school district inside our new Superintendents Center.
Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/superintendents-center/
- View this week's Student Video News Cast at www.eschoolnews.tv where you can also upload video too!
- Follow eSchool News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/eschoolnews
- Add our RSS feeds or our new widgets to any school web site. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/content-exchange-rss/
- Find the latest news in the current issue of eSchool News. Go to http://www.eschoolnews.com/current/

Schools seem to want something for nothing

Some districts are still in the "bring in the expert" mind-set. Surely most know from experience that this one-shot, one-day, talk from the "expert" just doesn't work when it comes to technology integration. Even some of the very best conferences are only good for getting one inspired. It is something different to keep teachers inspired all year long. The only way this can happen (in my opinion) is to have an integration specialist on hand, providing training, throughout the year. This specialist should be leading a professional learning community, offering after-school mini-classes, and summer workshops. Two major, major problems with this scenario (as I have experienced them): 1) As mentioned in the above posting, some of this should be taught at the university level in teacher pre-service education. Unfortunately, not many education professors have the required skills; Consider how new most of the web 2.0 tools are. Only specialized schools can offer such training. Therefore, a large percentage of such education must be acquired by self-study. 2) School districts are not willing to pay for such a person. Nor are they willing to acknowledge skills obtained through informal means. I have had several job offers recently and the conversations have gone something like this, "We want you to educate our teachers (school year, no Summer workshops), influencing hundreds of children, so, let's see, bachelor degree plus 23 graduate hours, that is $31,000." If paying a integration specialist a reasonable wage is not satisfactory, then districts should find an extremely motivated teacher, load their classroom down with technology and watch them completely burn themselves out trying to do it all alone. I hate to be the raging pessimist, but GOD only knows how disgusted I am with this scenario.

Posted By: rfantster, 2008-06-16 5:36 PM

Integrating Technology?

I am a Tech Coordinator, and do all phases of IT ExCEPT teaching in the classroom. I have found many teachers hat are nearing retirement REFUSE to use/learn technology. I have for 8 years offered to train, one on one, any teacher that needs help learning the basic technology. Not one has ever asked for help, including new teachers just entering the system. To learn, ANYONE must practice the on the concept to be learned. Computers are no different. If you don't practice, you can never learn computers/software. Computers today are so inexpensive that no one can truthfully say "I can't afford one." I had to buy my own and learn to use it without anyone teaching me. Quit crying wolf and do what you need to do to learn. I can't pour knowledge into your head, or isn't that taught anymore? In short, if you want to know how to use/integrate computers, the resources are there. Just don't cry when you don't avail yourself of them.

Posted By: therrington, 2008-06-16 5:05 PM

Teacher-motivation?

Unfortunately, not enough states and school districts really "require" technology integration. Supplying equipment, and even training is not enough. "If its not on the standardized test, we don't teach it" seems to be the rule too often - and hardly anybody "tests" for technology training; or checks that teachers are integrating technology...

Posted By: baldwim, 2008-06-16 4:23 PM

How about better K-12 curricular applications?

Like in any other area of applications, the products for the K-12 classroom need to better address the core curriculum teaching and learning. Otherwise "educational technology" will continue to be mostly about flashy equipment purchases, rather than meaningful, effective, efficient educational processes, and ease of use for the common teacher and student users.

Posted By: felipe.razo, 2008-06-16 3:55 PM

God Bless the NEA and AFT for funding and executing this work!

This is a significant and compelling piece of survey research. I fully concur with it's findings and conclusions. We indeed HAVE made a lot of progress. But these findings reveal two grave concerns: 1. Persistent and pernicious "technology gaps" between the "have" and "have not" schools. This particularly impacts access to and use of educational technologies in our nation's "Great City Schools." 2. Persistent low levels of the functional technology competencies required to support powerful instructional uses of technology in schools and classrooms. This should be a wake-up call to teacher education programs everywhere. Technology in teacher education programs should not be optional! Every aspiring pre-service teacher should be supported to acquire the pre-requisite competencies and every masters degree program for "in-service" teachers should do the same. Finally, it simply won't work unless America's educational leadership is provided with the background and support they need to do their part. If the graduate educational programs preparing (credentialing) the leadership for America's schools continue to virtually "ignore" preparation for technology leadership, no amount of additional $$ spent on technology preparation for teachers will result in real and lasting change. We know what needs to be done. Let's get to it! Bob Blomeyer (BobBl) http://www.blomeyerandclemente.com/

Posted By: bobblomeyer, 2008-06-11 12:01 PM

Posted By: bobblomeyer, 2008-06-11 11:40 AM

 

You need to be registered at eSchoolnews.com to add your comments. If you do not have a username / password please register here ! Registration is very simple and will not take much time!

 
Already registered? Login:
Username:  Want to know more?
Registation Benefits
Password: