Historically, we did not have to teach our students how to question the validity of information when we ensured the books in the library and in our classrooms were selected by educators. Providing our students exclusively with vetted information is no longer sufficient. Yes, we need to continue to give our students high-quality content, but we also need to prepare our students for a world that does not have a Dewey decimal number on the book jacket and is in their hands or pocket 24-7.
We also need to recognize that various media channels have different structures that require very specific lessons for literacy. At a minimum, our students should be in a position to say that they do not know, instead of confidently claiming to understand. Unfortunately, there are powerful forces in place—such as our traditional assessment designs—that keep us from creating innovative, web-based lessons. In this country, we tend to teach what we test. I do not know of any state or national test that measures web or media literacy. Without a test that requires this skill, we may be stuck in our paper-based definition of what it means to be literate.
There is another factor holding us back from teaching our students to be literate in the most powerful and ubiquitous media ever invented by society: We have spent too much time, money, and energy blocking various channels of information on the web, such as Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter in our schools, when we should have been carefully teaching students to understand the organizational structure of these channels.
The Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) requires K-12 schools to block objectionable material, but it also states that schools “must provide for educating minors about appropriate online behavior.” We seem to excel at the blocking provision, while we have basically ignored the education side of the law.
Just as we ensure that our students do not misinterpret a quotation to be attributable to the main author, we should also ensure that our students know the simple difference between a modified tweet, a retweet, and an original tweet. We also must teach students how to develop a line of inquiry in tracking down a primary source to verify an opinion on a website. One powerful fact-checking tool that all of our students (and adults) should know how to use is the Wayback Machine (www.archive.org), which has been backing up the web since 1995. Students can use this tool to find historical information online, such as what an organization or politician stated years ago, and then compare it to what is being reported in the present time.
We are in a mission-critical state of losing our democracy unless we broaden our definition of what it means to be literate today. As with reading print, web and media literacy needs to be embedded across the curriculum and within the design of assignments across all grades and subjects. Students need practice, practice, practice.
Our national policy of filtering the web in our schools to protect children from objectionable material was an incomplete solution, and one that has backfired to produce an ill-informed and easily manipulated electorate. No one would argue that we shouldn’t filter out highly objectionable material. However, the reality of life in a democracy is that the information flowing toward our citizens 24-7 across many digital channels is messy—even nasty—with multiple versions of the truth.
The one thing we can count on is that the web will get messier and nastier. We must prepare our students to navigate the reality of this messy world. Hanging on to the idea that somehow we can control the information our students access is counterproductive to one of the original tenets described by the Founding Fathers: “Education being necessary to its [democracy’s] success, a successful democracy must provide it.”
- 5 tips to keep online students motivated - June 8, 2023
- Collaborative edtech tools are changing the game for student engagement - June 8, 2023
- How our school handled the chaos of an active shooter hoax - June 7, 2023